Understanding repatriation: refugee perspectives on the importance of safety, reintegration, and hope

Understanding repatriation: refugee perspectives on the importance of safety, reintegration, and hope
复制标题

了解遣返:难民对安全、重返社会和希望重要性的看法

DOI:
10.1002/psp.647
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
Population, Space and Place
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zimmermann S
Zimmermann S
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zimmermann S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文使用丰富的经验数据,探讨遣返难民的角度来看,这是广泛忽视东道国框架内的这一主题。来自两个国家的参与者进行比较,他们如何对待不同或相同的遣返前景,而不同的背景情况下,这些案件影响了参与者框定讨论的方式。索马里人和阿富汗人都对返回后的安全和重返社会前景问题感到关切,并透露,这些也是他们在流亡期间所寻求的关键部分。此外,对变化的希望-或不希望变化-影响到他们是预期返回还是永久离开,他们寻求的是证据而不是变化的承诺,这表明与东道国更倾向于的早期期望不同。关于遣返的政策和政治讨论往往只对难民提出要求,而不问自己的优先事项。这种观点上的差距是紧张和不信任的根源,在没有参考本文所探讨的经验理解的情况下,试图促进回归的重点可能是错位的。本文最后问,除非我们能理解这种难民的条件下返回,那么它的实际含义是什么,它是谁的角度服务?版权所有© 2010约翰威利父子有限公司.
This paper uses rich, empirical data to explore repatriation from refugee perspectives, which are widely overlooked within host state framings of this topic. Participants from two countries are compared within how they approached the prospect of repatriating differently or alike, whilst different background contexts to these cases affected the ways in which participants framed discussions. Both the Somalis and Afghans were concerned with issues of safety and reintegration prospects upon return, and revealed that these were key parts of what they had also sought while living in exile. In addition, hope for change – or its absence – affected whether they anticipated returning or staying away permanently, with proof more than promise of change sought, so suggesting a difference with the early expectations more preferred by host states. Policy and political discussions of repatriation tend to make claims about refugees without asking about their own priorities. This gap in perspectives is a source of tension and distrust, and emphasis can be misplaced to try to promote return without reference to such empirical understandings as this paper explores. This paper concludes by asking whether unless we can understand return on such refugee terms, then what is its actual meaning and whose perspective does it serve? Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
冲突期间难民遣返:保护和返回后援助
DOI: --
发表时间: 1994
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
B. Stein;F. Cuny
通讯作者: F. Cuny
回家:以社区形式返回危地马拉的年轻玛雅难民的记忆策略
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
期刊: Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Rousseau;Maria Morales;P. Foxen
通讯作者: P. Foxen
不规则的二次流动到欧洲:在避难所之外寻求庇护
DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fen048
发表时间: 2008
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Zimmermann S
通讯作者: Zimmermann S
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00552.x
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Zimmermann S
通讯作者: Zimmermann S
重新构想回归神话:1974 年希族塞人难民的连续性和过渡
DOI: --
发表时间: 1999
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Zetter
通讯作者: R. Zetter