Participatory developments in majoritarian and consensus democracies

Participatory developments in majoritarian and consensus democracies
复制标题

多数民主和共识民主的参与性发展

DOI:
10.1080/00344893.2018.1495663
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Michels
Michels
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Geissel;Brigitte;Michels

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近,许多民主国家朝着让更多公民参与直接民主或公共审议的方向发展。这些发展是否与不同类型的民主有关?公众审议是否主要见于协商一致的民主政体,而直接民主则盛行于多数派民主政体?通过分析2012年左右的OECD国家,我们检验了这些假设。答案出人意料地清晰。选择一个民主国家选择直接民主文书或进行公众审议,既不是一分为二的,也与各自的民主模式类型无关。在此基础上,提出了四种参与式民主模式的新类型。
Recently, many democracies have developed towards more citizensT involvement in direct democracy or public deliberation. Are these developments linked to different types of democracy? Can public deliberation be mainly found in consensus democracies, whereas direct democracy prevails in majoritarian democracies? By analysing OECD countries around the year 2012, we examine these assumptions. The answer is surprisingly clear. The choice of a democracy to opt for direct democratic instruments or for public deliberation is neither dichotomous nor is it related to the respective pattern type of democracy. Based on these findings, a new typology with four participatory models of democracy is suggested.
公民投票和协商民主
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.007
发表时间: 2015
期刊: Electoral Studies
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
L. Leduc
通讯作者: L. Leduc
DOI: 10.1177/0020852311399851
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Ank Michels
通讯作者: Ank Michels
Lijphart 扩展:经合组织发达国家民主的三个维度?
DOI: 10.1017/s1755773909000071
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
A. Vatter
通讯作者: A. Vatter
DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034006003
发表时间: 2001
影响因子: 5
作者:
S. Scarrow
通讯作者: S. Scarrow
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00630.x
发表时间: 2006
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Maija Setälä
通讯作者: Maija Setälä