Translation of fear reflex into impaired cognitive function mediated by worry
Translation of fear reflex into impaired cognitive function mediated by worry
复制标题
将恐惧反射转化为担忧介导的认知功能受损
DOI:
10.1007/s11434-016-1177-9
复制
发表时间:
2016-10
期刊:
影响因子:
18.9
通讯作者:
Chen Antao
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhuang Qian;Chen Antao
Anxiety is generally characterized by cognitive impairment. In particular, the worry dimension of anxiety is closely related to impaired cognitive performance [1, 2]. Worry interferes with the transmission of signal from action-monitoring to post-error adjustments, which leads to unimproved behavioral performance [3]. Additionally, if worry refers to the cognitive dimension of anxiety, fear can be considered as emotional and psychological arousal. The relationship between fear and worry has been explored in numerous studies. Individuals in fear are more sensitive to emotional stimuli than those in worry, which shows the distinction between fear and worry in attention engagement [4]. Besides, worry, as the contrast avoidance, may attempt to inhibit the fear experience [5]. The interaction between fear and worry has a significant effect on the anxious experience. For example, when a snake appears unexpectedly, one may jump and yell automatically (fear reflex). Once fear is generalized, the fearful individual may avoid the related cue, make unrealistic appraisals and even have anticipation about similar stimuli. With the negative bias, the individual experience more fear of the threat. Meanwhile, the individual engages in worrisome thinking (worry), such as ‘‘What would have happened if I had stepped on it?’’. Although the intention is to control the fear, this linguistic activity actually leads to greater negative emotions and physiological activation. In addition, the worrisome thoughts impede performance during cognitive tasks. In brief, worry has an effect on the fear experience and cognitive function (in anxiety groups). However, it remains unclear how worry is involved in the translation of fear into disrupted cognitive performance under the condition of explicit threat. Previous research has described five processes of uncertainty and anticipation in the model of anxiety [6]. The core of this model are disrupted expectancies regarding uncertainty about potential threats, which manifests as excessive estimates of probability and cost, heightened vigilance, biased attention toward threat, and impaired safety learning. However, maladaptive responses to specific fear stimuli cannot be explained in this model. In addition, under the condition of an explicit threat, the fear reflex is often automatic and elicited before worry. Therefore, to understand how maladaptive responses are engaged and disruptive to cognitive performance under the condition of specific threat, we propose four processes to address the translation of fear into impaired cognitive outcomes through worry, including the fear reflex; anticipation and appraisal with negative bias; contrast avoidance of worry; and impaired cognitive performance (Fig. 1). During these processes, linguistic activity during worry exacerbates the negative experience and plays a critical role in cognitive impairment. When a salient threat emerges unexpectedly, the brain responds automatically (fear reflex). The bottom-up sensory mechanisms, for example, the right inferior temporal gyrus and right temporoparietal cortex are implicated [4]. During this process, the amygdala is a key structure in fear perception and the dACC is associated with the subjective experience of negative affect. Meanwhile, the amygdala and hippocampus-based memory system are recruited for acquisition and retrieval of fear memory traces. The memories of previous experience linked to interception, affect, and cognition are also recalled instantly. In this case, the related brain regions are engaged. Subsequently, all information is integrated and transmitted to the anterior
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
18.4
作者:
Newman MG;Llera SJ;Erickson TM;Przeworski A;Castonguay LG
通讯作者:
Castonguay LG
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Spielberg JM;De Leon AA;Bredemeier K;Heller W;Engels AS;Warren SL;Crocker LD;Sutton BP;Miller GA
通讯作者:
Miller GA
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1002291107
发表时间:
2010-09-21
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Snyder, Hannah R.;Hutchison, Natalie;Munakata, Yuko
通讯作者:
Munakata, Yuko
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Tim P. Moran;E. Bernat;Selin Aviyente;Hans S. Schroder;J. Moser
通讯作者:
Tim P. Moran;E. Bernat;Selin Aviyente;Hans S. Schroder;J. Moser
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Engels, Anna S.;Heller, Wendy;Miller, Gregory A.
通讯作者:
Miller, Gregory A.