Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in The Netherlands.
Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in The Netherlands.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1478-4505-10-33
复制
发表时间：
2012-10-17
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
De Vries NK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jansen MW;De Leeuw E;Hoeijmakers M;De Vries NK
加入实践、研究和政策领域是提高解决复杂公共卫生问题所需的高质量绩效的一个重要方面。“加入域”意味着对线性和技术官僚知识翻译方法的背离。将实践、研究和政策三角结合起来，就是认识三角的要素，认识三角的障碍，识别三角的可能合作策略，研究三角在特定条件下的战略有效性。本文考察了在荷兰建立公共卫生学术合作中心的动态过程，其目标是使政策、实践和研究这三个领域成为平等的工作伙伴。一种解释解释学的方法被用来解释在三个领域之间的联系的合作现象。该项目明确以当前的组织文化和惯例为基础，应用于关系行动。在检查过程中，我们使用了定量（如记录）和定性（如访谈和观察）的数据。采用行动者网络理论、制度重新设计理论和模糊边界理论对数据进行解释。结果显示了战略层面的承诺。然而，在战术层面，管理人员倾向于优先考虑日常事务，而政策领域仍然缺席。在操作层面，从业者学会了在现实生活中进行博士研究，研究人员熟悉了实践和政策问题，从而产生了新的研究计划。我们的结论是，在联系中工作是一个不断形成和改革的过程。特别是基于制度重新设计理论的战略可能有助于更积极地激励管理人员参与建立相互支持的网络。
Joining the domains of practice, research and policy is an important aspect of boosting the quality performance required to tackle complex public health problems. “Joining domains” implies a departure from the linear and technocratic knowledge-translation approach. Integrating the practice, research and policy triangle means knowing its elements, appreciating the barriers, identifying possible cooperation strategies and studying strategy effectiveness under specified conditions. This article examines the dynamic process of developing an Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health in the Netherlands, with the objective of achieving that the three domains of policy, practice and research become working partners on an equal footing. An interpretative hermeneutic approach was used to interpret the phenomenon of collaboration at the nexus between the three domains. The project was explicitly grounded in current organizational culture and routines, applied to nexus action. In the process of examination, we used both quantitative (e.g. records) and qualitative data (e.g., interviews and observations). The data were interpreted using the Actor-Network, Institutional Re-Design and Blurring the Boundaries theories. Results show commitment at strategic level. At the tactical level, however, managers were inclined to prioritize daily routine, while the policy domain remained absent. At the operational level, practitioners learned to do PhD research in real-life practice and researchers became acquainted with problems of practice and policy, resulting in new research initiatives. We conclude that working at the nexus is an ongoing process of formation and reformation. Strategies based on Institutional Re-Design theories in particular might help to more actively stimulate managers’ involvement to establish mutually supportive networks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Ashworth, PD
通讯作者：
Ashworth, PD
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
de Leeuw, E
通讯作者：
de Leeuw, E
影响因子：
4
作者：
Jansen, Maria W. J.;van Oers, Hans A. M.;de Vries, Nanne K.
通讯作者：
de Vries, Nanne K.
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Fleming, Valerie;Gaidys, Uta;Robb, Yvonne
通讯作者：
Robb, Yvonne
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Ashworth, PD
通讯作者：
Ashworth, PD