Approaching the human in the loop – legal perspectives on hybrid human/algorithmic decision-making in three contexts
Approaching the human in the loop – legal perspectives on hybrid human/algorithmic decision-making in three contexts
复制标题
接近人在循环中——三种背景下人/算法混合决策的法律视角
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Markus Naarttijärvi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Therese Enarsson;Lena Enqvist;Markus Naarttijärvi
公共和私人组织越来越多地实施各种算法决策系统。通过法律的和实际的激励措施，人类往往需要保持在这种决策的循环中，以保持人类的代理和问责制，提供法律的保障，或执行质量控制。引入这种人类监督导致各种形式的半自动或混合决策-算法和人类代理相互作用。在以往研究的基础上，我们说明了法律的依赖性形成的动力混合决策的警务，社会福利和在线节制的情况下。我们强调进一步需要在更广泛的数据保护、宪法和行政法律的原则的法律的环境中考虑混合决策，以及需要对这些原则进行背景分析。最后，我们概述了一个研究议程，以捕捉上下文的混合决策的法律的依赖关系，指出需要超越法律的理论研究，采用社会技术的角度和实证研究。
ABSTRACT Public and private organizations are increasingly implementing various algorithmic decision-making systems. Through legal and practical incentives, humans will often need to be kept in the loop of such decision-making to maintain human agency and accountability, provide legal safeguards, or perform quality control. Introducing such human oversight results in various forms of semi-automated, or hybrid decision-making – where algorithmic and human agents interact. Building on previous research we illustrate the legal dependencies forming an impetus for hybrid decision-making in the policing, social welfare, and online moderation contexts. We highlight the further need to situate hybrid decision-making in a wider legal environment of data protection, constitutional and administrative legal principles, as well as the need for contextual analysis of such principles. Finally, we outline a research agenda to capture contextual legal dependencies of hybrid decision-making, pointing to the need to go beyond legal doctrinal studies by adopting socio-technical perspectives and empirical studies.
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Brayne, Sarah;Christin, Angele
通讯作者：
Christin, Angele
重建正义？
影响因子：
0.7
作者：
Morison J
通讯作者：
Morison J