A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects
A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects
复制标题
交通基础设施项目社会评估的混合方法
DOI：
10.1007/s11116-021-10176-6
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Lucas K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lucas K
在本文中，我们提出了一种混合的定量和定性方法，以充分捕捉交通项目对当地人民和社区的可衡量和不太明显的社会影响。该方法用于评估英国威尔士贫困地区战略道路旁通项目的潜在社会影响。该项目旨在刺激其所服务地区的当地经济增长和再生。在“前后”的案例研究中，我们结合了对二级数据集的细粒度、基于gis的空间分析，与生活在道路附近的五个社区的当地居民进行定性参与性练习，并与当地专业利益相关者进行了访谈。这种混合方法大大提高了对道路项目的社会效益和弊端的理解。它有助于揭示当地的担忧，否则仅从二级数据集分析就不会明显。定性研究还成功地提出了新的“难以触及”的声音，这些声音在正式咨询和公众参与过程中没有被听到。研究结果显示，如果在有关工程路线和设计的决策过程中及早进行社会评估，本可大大提高工程项目给当地居民带来的社会效益，同时亦可避免工程项目对当地造成的一些负面社会影响。该文件提出了在交通项目的备选方案评估、项目设计缓解和后评价阶段改进社会评估做法和采用社会评估的建议。
In this paper, we propose a mixed methods quantitative and qualitative approach to capture fully the measurable and less tangible social impacts of transport projects on local people and communities. The approach was used to assess the potential social impacts of a strategic road by-pass project case study in a deprived region of Wales in the UK. The project specifically aimed to stimulate local economic growth and regeneration in the local areas it serves. In a ‘before and after’ case study, we combined fine-grained, GIS-based spatial analysis of secondary datasets with qualitative participative exercises with the local residents of the five communities living adjacent to the road, and interviews with professional local stakeholders. This mixed methods approach significantly enhanced understanding of both the social benefits and disbenefits of the road project. It helped to reveal local concerns that would not otherwise have been apparent from secondary dataset analysis alone. The qualitative studies were also successful in bringing to the table new ‘hard to reach’ voices that had not been heard through the formal consultation and public engagement process. The study revealed that the social benefits accruing to local people from the project could have been significantly enhanced, whilst a number of its locally occurring negative social impacts could have been avoided had social assessment been employed earlier in the decision processes concerning its routing and design. Recommendations to improve the practice and uptake of social assessments at the option appraisal, project design mitigation and post evaluation stages of transport projects are included in the paper.
登录
查看更多内容
设计包容性交通调查：对弱势群体进行抽样
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Delbosc;G. Currie
通讯作者：
G. Currie
环境正义、影响评估和知识政治：评估环境结果的社会分配的影响
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Walker
通讯作者：
G. Walker
制图政策和计划：英格兰使用 GIS 来传达空间关系
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
C. Wong;M. Baker;B. Webb;S. Hincks;Andreas Schulze
通讯作者：
Andreas Schulze
确定全包式 MaaS 出租车对曼彻斯特其他模式潜在影响的范围界定指标
影响因子：
--
作者：
Philips I
通讯作者：
Philips I
交通和出行正义：不断发展的讨论
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Ersilia Verlinghieri;T. Schwanen
通讯作者：
T. Schwanen