PhDs by publications: an ‘easy way out’?
PhDs by publications: an ‘easy way out’?
复制标题
通过出版物获得博士学位：“简单的出路”？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Carolyn Grant
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Niven;Carolyn Grant
通过出版物获得博士学位是一种相对较新的博士研究模式，特别是在人文学科或教育领域。本文描述了两位作家在这一流派和这些院系进行博士研究的经历。每个人都发现了利用大量已发表的研究论文来发展总体论文的替代方法。作者认为，虽然对某些人来说这可能是一个务实的选择，但出版物的博士学位更有可能是高度复杂的元叙事，而且对过去研究的概述在寻求连贯性时充满了理论、概念和认识论的挑战。他们声称，“通过出版物获得博士学位”或“通过出版物获得博士学位”这一术语具有误导性：在人文学科或教育研究的认识论空间中，这种博士研究模式更准确地表述为“通过出版物获得博士学位”。他们的结论是，该模型的特殊功能在于它优先考虑知识构建的过程以及对研究人员个人逐渐出现的“博士气质”的描述。
PhDs by publications are a relatively new model for doctoral research, especially in the context of the Humanities or Education. This paper describes two writers’ experiences of conducting doctoral studies in this genre and in these faculties. Each discover alternative ways of employing a body of published research papers in development of an overarching thesis. The writers argue that whilst it can be a pragmatic choice for some, PhDs by publications are more likely to be highly complex meta-narratives and that an overview of past research is fraught with theoretical, conceptual and epistemological challenges in the quest for coherence. They claim that the nomenclature ‘PhDs by publications’ or ‘through publications’ is misleading: in the epistemological space of Humanities or Education studies, this mode of doctoral research is more accurately represented as a ‘PhD with or alongside publications’. They conclude that the particular affordance of the model is that it privileges accounts of the process of knowledge building and of descriptions of the gradual emergence of ‘doctoralness’ in the person of the researcher.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
Research in the schools : a nationally refereed journal sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Sandelowski;C. Voils;J. Barroso
通讯作者：
M. Sandelowski;C. Voils;J. Barroso