Multi-scale validation of GLEAM evapotranspiration products over China via ChinaFLUX ET measurements
Multi-scale validation of GLEAM evapotranspiration products over China via ChinaFLUX ET measurements
复制标题
通过 ChinaFLUX ET 测量对中国 GLEAM 蒸散量产品进行多尺度验证
DOI：
10.1080/01431161.2017.1346400
复制
发表时间：
2017-10
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Yong B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yang Xiuqin;Yong Bin;Ren Liliang;Zhang Yuqing;Long Di;Yong B
摘要 陆地蒸散（ET）是陆地生态系统的一个关键组成部分，因为它是水文、能量和碳循环的纽带。基于卫星的观测通常被用于提供高分辨率、大规模的蒸散估算。
ABSTRACT Land evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of terrestrial ecosystems, as it is the nexus of hydrological, energy, and carbon cycles. Satellite-based observations are commonly utilized to provide high-resolution, large-scale ET estimates. The ground-based validation of such large-scale estimates is necessary to ensure that remotely sensed ET characteristics are accurate, and to extend their various applications. The Global Land-surface Evaporation Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM) combines a wide range of multi-satellite observations to estimate daily actual evaporation through a process-based methodology. In this study, we focused on evaluating a daily GLEAM 0.25° ET product using in-situ eddy covariance (EC) ET data (2003–2005) as a benchmark at eight sites from the Chinese Flux Observation and Research Network (ChinaFLUX), which contains several biome types (croplands, grasslands, shrublands, savannas, and forests) across China at a range of temporal scales (from daily, to monthly, to annual). The results indicated that the ET products of the Global Land-surface Evaporation Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM ET) over different time scales can estimate actual ET with reasonable accuracy. GLEAM showed high skill scores for most of the land-cover types except at the Xishuangbanna forest site (XSBN), where significantly systematic bias was detected at each individual temporal scale. Overall, GLEAM ET products were closer to the EC observations at the three grassland sites than at the four forest sites or the cropland site. GLEAM significantly overestimated the EC measurements at the four forest sites and one cropland site, while a slight underestimation occurred at the three grassland sites; there was a year-long systematic overestimation for GLEAM at the four forest sites. The daily GLEAM ET aggregated by monthly and annual data agreed more closely with EC measurements than those taken at the daily timescale. The results also showed a high average correlation coefficient (r) with in-situ EC observations at all sites, at daily (r = 0.71), monthly (r = 0.86), and annual (r = 0.79) time scales in addition to ET season-dependent characteristics for satellite estimation errors. The results presented here contribute to further assessment of the quality and uncertainty of GLEAM ET products, which may benefit future advancements in the ET algorithm and its product quality.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
N. Ghilain;A. Arboleda;F. Gellens-Meulenberghs
通讯作者：
N. Ghilain;A. Arboleda;F. Gellens-Meulenberghs
影响因子：
13.5
作者：
Cleugh, Helen A.;Leuning, Ray;Running, Steven W.
通讯作者：
Running, Steven W.
评估一源和二源能量平衡模型，通过 Landsat 得出的表面温度和现场测量来估算地表蒸散量
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Jinyong Lou;Yuanyuan Jia;Chuanrong Li;Ronglin Tang;Kun-Shan Chen;Xiaomin Sun;Zhao-Liang Li
通讯作者：
Zhao-Liang Li
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Zhang Y;Peña-Arancibia JL;McVicar TR;Chiew FH;Vaze J;Liu C;Lu X;Zheng H;Wang Y;Liu YY;Miralles DG;Pan M
通讯作者：
Pan M
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Miralles, D. G.;Holmes, T. R. H.;Dolman, A. J.
通讯作者：
Dolman, A. J.