Is the production of a Covid-19 vaccine using transformed Pasteurella plausible?
Is the production of a Covid-19 vaccine using transformed Pasteurella plausible?
复制标题
使用转化的巴斯德氏菌生产 Covid-19 疫苗是否可行?
DOI:
10.1136/vr.m2423
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rycroft AN
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rycroft AN
WE read with interest the letters from Aung Myint and Trevor Jones (VR, 28 March 2020, vol 186, p 388 and VR, 4/11 April 2020, vol 186, p 419) describing their experience with vaccination of poultry against infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in Myanmar and the proposal that a similar method could be used to control Covid-19. While a viable method for the production of a Covid-19 vaccine is of huge interest at the moment, and it is important to adopt the experience and lessons from prophylactic vaccination in veterinary medicine, we feel that some aspects of the underlying science put forward in these letters require supporting evidence and further clarification to demonstrate they are plausible. The authors speculate that ‘administration of a vaccine containing formalin-killed Pasteurella multocida cells, prepared as we described, could be effective in therapy if administered early in the course of [Covid-19], by stimulating the production of specific protective antibodies’. Are the authors suggesting that orally administered inactivated P multocidacells expressing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins will not be digested in the human stomach and will induce virus-neutralising systemic antibodies? The authors also state that ‘when mixed with cell lysates of virusinfected tissues, P multocidatook up free viral genes and incorporated them into its genome’. However, since P multocidais known to be difficult to transform (even using high-voltage electroporation), 1, 2 and natural transformation in Pasteurellaceae requires specific uptake sequences, 3 this seems highly unlikely. Such a process would not generate a very standardised vaccine, but would likely have large batch-to-batch variations. Furthermore, the process of transformation, if successful, would result in a genetically modified product, and one would have to show quite extensively that it is appropriately inactivated without affecting any vaccine components. As a coronavirus, IBV has an RNA genome and contains no DNA with which to transform the P multocida. How do the authors suggest the viral RNA is converted to DNA before being rapidly degraded inside the bacterial cell? 4
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
M. Bills;J. Medd;R. Chappel;B. Adler
通讯作者:
B. Adler
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
L. Jablonski;N. Sriranganathan;S. Boyle;G. Carter
通讯作者:
G. Carter