Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory

Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory
复制标题

前瞻记忆中犯错的结构相关性

DOI:
10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.013
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Bugg, Julie M.
Bugg, Julie M.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scullin, Michael K.;Ball, B. Hunter;Bugg, Julie M.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

前瞻性记忆是指记住执行预期的未来行动,例如记住在早餐时服用药物。从历史上看,该领域一直专注于最初记住前瞻性记忆任务的失败(遗漏错误),但有趣的是,个体偶尔会在完成前瞻性记忆任务后重复该任务(例如,双剂量)。这些前瞻性记忆失活/遗忘的失败被称为委托错误。目前注册的研究调查了47名健康老年人的委托错误实验室测量的结构神经影像学相关性。现存的理论在他们的预测结果不同:委员会错误的风险被预测为最高的个人与较小的内侧颞叶体积(输出监测理论),较大的外侧前额叶皮层体积(剩余激活理论),或较大的内侧颞叶体积和较小的外侧前额叶皮层体积的组合(双重机制理论)。在注册的分析中,我们发现更多的委托错误与更大的内侧颞叶/海马灰质体积相关(支持双重机制理论),但与外侧顶叶、额极或腹外侧/背外侧前额叶皮层的灰质或白色体积无关(不支持双重机制理论)。在事后分析中,较小的体积在外侧眶额皮质与更多的委员会错误,可能表明PFC控制的双重机制理论在概念上是正确的,但不同的PFC子区域比预期施加控制委员会错误。总的来说,登记和事后分析结果显示,MTL/PFC区域的功能分离与双重机制理论比其他理论更一致。
Prospective memory refers to remembering to perform an intended future action, such as remembering to take medication with breakfast. Historically, the field has focused on failures to initially remember a prospective memory task (omission errors), but interestingly, individuals will occasionally repeat a prospective memory action after it has been completed (e.g., double dosing). These failures in prospective memory deactivation/forgetting are termed commission errors. The current registered study investigated structural neuroimaging correlates of a laboratory measure of commission errors in 47 healthy older adults. Extant theories differed in their predicted outcomes: commission error risk was predicted to be highest in individuals with smaller medial temporal lobe volume (output monitoring theory), larger lateral prefrontal cortex volume (residual activation theory), or a combination of larger medial temporal lobe volume and smaller lateral prefrontal cortex volume (dual mechanisms theory). In registered analyses, we found that a higher number of commission errors was associated with larger medial temporal lobe/hippocampal grey matter volume (supporting dual mechanisms theory), but not with grey or white matter volume in the lateral parietal lobe, frontal pole, or a composite of ventrolateral/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (not supporting dual mechanisms theory). In post hoc analyses, smaller volume in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex was associated with a higher number of commission errors, possibly indicating that the dual mechanisms theory of PFC control was conceptually correct, but that a different PFC subregion than anticipated exerts control over commission errors. Collectively, the registered and post hoc analysis findings showed a functional dissociation across MTL/PFC regions that was more consistent with the dual mechanisms theory than the alternative theories.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Psychological Research
影响因子: --
作者:
Moritz Walser;T. Goschke;Rico Fischer
通讯作者: Rico Fischer
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0337-4
发表时间: 2013-02-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Pink, Jeffrey E.;Dodson, Chad S.
通讯作者: Dodson, Chad S.
DOI: 10.1080/01688639108405107
发表时间: 1991-11-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
ANDERSON, SW;DAMASIO, H;TRANEL, D
通讯作者: TRANEL, D
在分散注意力的情况下完成预期的行动:如果有机会我还会这样做吗?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Angel Muñoz Gómez Andrade
通讯作者: Angel Muñoz Gómez Andrade
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1187756
发表时间: 2017-01-01
期刊: MEMORY
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Anderson, Francis T.;Einstein, Gilles O.
通讯作者: Einstein, Gilles O.