Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task

Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task
复制标题

具身语义处理:非手动任务中的身体-物体交互效果

DOI:
10.1515/langcog.2011.001
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. Pexman
P. Pexman
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michele Wellsby;Paul D. Siakaluk;W. J. Owen;P. Pexman

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

抽象的身体-物体相互作用(BOI)衡量了人们对人体与单词所指对象之间物理上相互作用的便利性的看法。促进性BOI效应,包括对高BOI单词的更快反应,已经在使用按钮按下反应的一些视觉单词识别任务中被报道。由于BOI效应仅在按钮按下任务中观察到,因此这种效应可能是由于运动系统中高BOI词的启动,而不是激活词汇语义系统中存储的运动信息。如果这一假设是正确的,在使用口头回答的任务中不应该观察到BOI效应。我们在三个版本的GO/NO-GO语义分类任务中检验了这一假设:一个版本要求按钮按下反应,而另外两个版本要求言语反应。与运动启动假说相反,我们在三个版本的语义分类任务中都观察到了易化BOI效应。这些结果支持这一推论,即储存的运动信息确实是词汇语义系统的一个重要组成部分。
Abstract Body-object interaction (BOI) measures people's perceptions of the ease with which a human body can physically interact with a word's referent. Facilitatory BOI effects, involving faster responses for high BOI words, have been reported in a number of visual word recognition tasks using button press responses. Since BOI effects have only been observed in button-press tasks, it is possible that the effects may be due to priming by high BOI words of the motor system, rather than activation of stored motor information in the lexical semantic system. If this hypothesis is correct, BOI effects should not be observed in tasks using verbal responses. We tested this hypothesis in three versions of a go/no-go semantic categorization task: one version required button press responses, whereas the other two versions required verbal responses. Contrary to the motor priming hypothesis, we observed facilitatory BOI effects in all three versions of the semantic categorization task. These results support the inference that stored motor information is indeed an important component of the lexical semantic system.
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1140
发表时间: 1995-09-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
STRAIN, E;PATTERSON, K;SEIDENBERG, MS
通讯作者: SEIDENBERG, MS