Minding Nature: Gallagher and the Relevance of Phenomenology to Cognitive Science
Minding Nature: Gallagher and the Relevance of Phenomenology to Cognitive Science
复制标题
关注自然:加拉格尔以及现象学与认知科学的相关性
DOI:
10.1080/24740500.2018.1552085
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Clavel Vázquez M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Clavel Vázquez M
In ‘Rethinking Nature: Phenomenology and a Non-reductionist Cognitive Science’, Gallagher sets out to overcome resistance to the idea that phenomenology is relevant to cognitive science. He argues that the relevance in question may be secured if we rethink the concept of nature. For Gallagher, this transformed concept of nature—which is to be distinguished from the classic scientific conception of nature in that it embraces irreducible subjectivity—is already at work in some contemporary enactive phenomenological approaches to cognitive science. Following a summary of Gallagher’s argument, we argue that this rethinking of nature is not necessary to secure the aim in question. We articulate two alternative ways of achieving the relevance of phenomenology to cognitive science. The first, which turns on a minimal notion of naturalism, leaves the classic scientific conception of nature intact. The second, which turns on a practice-based analysis of collaboration between phenomenology and cognitive science, leaves it open which concept of nature one should adopt. As we show, each of the proposals on the table (Gallagher’s own and our two alternatives) comes at a cost. Which of the three proposals is the more attractive will depend on which cost one wants to pay.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1980
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
E. Husserl;T. Klein;William E. Pohl
通讯作者:
William E. Pohl
DOI:
10.2307/1422869
发表时间:
1993-01
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
F. Varela;E. Thompson;E. Rosch
通讯作者:
F. Varela;E. Thompson;E. Rosch
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Wheeler
通讯作者:
M. Wheeler
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
S. Palermo;E. Giuffra;Valeria Arzenton;M. Bucchi
通讯作者:
M. Bucchi
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
H. Preester
通讯作者:
H. Preester