SoK: Science, Security and the Elusive Goal of Security as a Scientific Pursuit
SoK: Science, Security and the Elusive Goal of Security as a Scientific Pursuit
复制标题
SoK：科学、安全以及作为科学追求的安全目标
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. V. Oorschot
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cormac Herley;P. V. Oorschot
过去十年来，让安全研究变得更加“科学”的呼声越来越高。从表面上看，大多数人都认为这是可取的，因为人们普遍认为“科学”是一种积极的力量。然而，我们发现，在计算机安全研究的背景下，“科学”的含义几乎没有明确的定义，也没有就“安全科学”应该是什么样子达成共识。我们选择性地回顾了科学史和科学哲学方面的工作以及“安全科学”标签下的近期工作。我们探讨了在科学与安全相关的主题下所做的工作，将其与历史科学联系起来，并提供我们希望能够激发进一步探索和指导的观察和见解。我们的发现包括，其他科学界已达成共识的实践在安全方面似乎很少被使用或认可，并且方法论错误的模式仍未得到解决。
The past ten years has seen increasing calls to makesecurity research more "scientific".On the surface, most agree that this is desirable, given universal recognition of "science" as a positive force. However, we find that there is little clarity on what "scientific" means inthe context of computer security research, or consensus onwhat a "Science of Security" should look like. We selectively review work in the history and philosophy of scienceand more recent work under the label "Science of Security".We explore what has been done under the theme of relating science and security, put this in context with historical science, and offer observations and insights we hope maymotivate further exploration and guidance. Among our findings are thatpractices on which the rest of science has reached consensus appear little usedor recognized in security, and a pattern of methodological errors continues unaddressed.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Baumeister, RF;Bratslavsky, E;Tice, DM
通讯作者：
Tice, DM