Comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI with perivascular ultrasound to quantify blood flow in the abdomen and introduction of a porcine model of pre-hepatic portal hypertension.
Comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI with perivascular ultrasound to quantify blood flow in the abdomen and introduction of a porcine model of pre-hepatic portal hypertension.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s00330-017-4862-4
复制
发表时间:
2017-12
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Reeder SB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Frydrychowicz A;Roldan-Alzate A;Winslow E;Consigny D;Campo CA;Motosugi U;Johnson KM;Wieben O;Reeder SB
Objectives of this study were to compare radial time-resolved phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow-MRI) with perivascular ultrasound (pvUS) and to explore a porcine model of acute pre-hepatic portal hypertension (PHTN). Abdominal 4D Flow-MRI and pvUS in portal and splenic vein, hepatic and both renal arteries were performed in 13 pigs of approximately 60 kg. In six pigs, measurements were repeated after partial portal vein (PV) ligature. Inter-and intra-reader comparisons and statistical analysis including Bland–Altman (BA) comparison, paired Student’s t tests and linear regression were performed. PvUS and 4D Flow-MRI measurements agreed well; flow before partial PV ligature was 322 ± 30 ml/min in pvUS and 297 ± 27 ml/min in MRI (p = 0.294), and average BA difference was 25 ml/min [−322; 372]. Inter- and intra-reader results differed very little, revealed excellent correlation (R2 = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively) and resulted in BA differences of −5 ml/min [−161; 150] and −2 ml/min [−28; 25], respectively. After PV ligature, PV flow decreased from 356 ± 50 to 298 ± 61 ml/min (p = 0.02), and hepatic arterial flow increased from 277 ± 36 to 331 ± 65 ml/min (p = n.s.). The successful in vivo comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI to perivascular ultrasound revealed good agreement of abdominal blood flow although with considerable spread of results. A model of pre-hepatic PHTN was successfully introduced and acute responses monitored.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Ganter, Christoph C.;Buser, Christof;Jakob, Stephan M.
通讯作者:
Jakob, Stephan M.
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Ley, Sebastian;Unterhinninghofen, Roland;Szabo, Gabor
通讯作者:
Szabo, Gabor
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Jung, Bernd;Honal, Matthias;Markl, Michael
通讯作者:
Markl, Michael
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Frydrychowicz, A.;Landgraf, B. R.;Niespodzany, E.;Verma, R. W.;Roldan-Alzate, A.;Johnson, K. M.;Wieben, O.;Reeder, S. B.
通讯作者:
Reeder, S. B.
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Frydrychowicz A;Wieben O;Niespodzany E;Reeder SB;Johnson KM;François CJ
通讯作者:
François CJ