Controversies in assessing risk and deviancy in sex offenders with intellectual disabilities
Controversies in assessing risk and deviancy in sex offenders with intellectual disabilities
复制标题
评估智力障碍性犯罪者的风险和异常行为存在争议
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Leam A. Craig
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leam A. Craig
摘要虽然文献上的评估，治疗和管理的非智力残疾的性犯罪者是公认的，它只是在最近几年，研究人员和临床医生都集中在性犯罪者与智力残疾（ID）。本文主要关注两个方面：风险和累犯的评估，本文第一部分回顾了性犯罪者性犯罪再犯风险评估的相关文献，确定了与性犯罪者性犯罪再犯风险相关的静态和动态风险因素，并使用精算风险评估量表和结构化风险评估方法，对性犯罪者性犯罪再犯风险进行了评估。考虑对这一客户群体的风险评估系统。本文的第二部分讨论了与ID性犯罪者的性偏差的评估相关的困难。另一种方法来评估偏差被认为是在偏差行为进行比较，对四组连续的正常到偏差的性行为的发展和时序水平。文献中提出了一些关于评估该客户群体的风险和性偏差的建议。
Abstract While the literature on the assessment, treatment and management of non-intellectual disabled sex offenders is well established, it is only in recent years that researchers and clinicians have focused on sex offenders with intellectual disability (ID). This article focuses on two areas: the assessment of risk and recidivism, and the assessment of sexual deviancy in sex offenders with ID. The first part of this article reviews the literature on the assessment of sexual offence recidivism risk for sex offenders with ID. Static and dynamic risk factors associated with sexual recidivism risk in sex offenders with ID are identified and the use of actuarial risk assessment scales and structured risk assessment systems with this client group are considered. The second part of this article discusses difficulties associated with the assessment of sexual deviancy in sex offenders with ID. An alternative approach to assessing deviancy is considered where deviant behaviour is compared against a four-group continuum of normal to deviant sexual behaviour in terms of developmental and chronological levels. From the literature a number of suggestions are made regarding the assessment of risk and sexual deviancy with this client group.
性侵犯男性对女性交流的看法：检验三种解释。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Malamuth,NM;Brown,LM
通讯作者：
Brown,LM