A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.
A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1471-2288-11-29
复制
发表时间：
2011-03-16
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Cooper K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carroll C;Booth A;Cooper K
文献中提倡各种定性数据合成的不同方法。本文的目的是描述一种定性证据综合的实用方法的应用，以及从采用这种“最佳拟合”框架合成方法中学到的经验教训。
对框架合成的评估是对证据进行定性系统审查的一种方法，该方法探讨了成年人在主要预防结直肠癌的背景下对潜在药物采取潜在药物的看法。
来自北美，澳大利亚，英国和欧洲的二十篇论文符合包容性标准。从文献中确定的相关的现有概念模型中确定了14个主题，然后将其用于编码提取的数据。进一步的分析导致生成更复杂的模型，并具有其他主题。该综合需要将次要框架和主题分析方法结合在一起，并在卫生技术评估时间内进行。
发现此处开发和描述的新颖务实的“最佳拟合”方法适合目的。未来的研究应试图进一步测试这种定性数据综合的方法。
A variety of different approaches to the synthesis of qualitative data are advocated in the literature. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of a pragmatic method of qualitative evidence synthesis and the lessons learned from adopting this "best fit" framework synthesis approach. An evaluation of framework synthesis as an approach to the qualitative systematic review of evidence exploring the views of adults to the taking of potential agents within the context of the primary prevention of colorectal cancer. Twenty papers from North America, Australia, the UK and Europe met the criteria for inclusion. Fourteen themes were identified a priori from a related, existing conceptual model identified in the literature, which were then used to code the extracted data. Further analysis resulted in the generation of a more sophisticated model with additional themes. The synthesis required a combination of secondary framework and thematic analysis approaches and was conducted within a health technology assessment timeframe. The novel and pragmatic "best fit" approach to framework synthesis developed and described here was found to be fit for purpose. Future research should seek to test further this approach to qualitative data synthesis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Floyd, DL;Prentice-Dunn, S;Rogers, RW
通讯作者：
Rogers, RW
DOI：
10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3
发表时间：
2003-02-01
期刊：
Social science & medicine (1982)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Campbell, Rona;Pound, Pandora;Donovan, Jenny
通讯作者：
Donovan, Jenny
影响因子：
--
作者：
Thomas, J;Harden, A;Kavanagh, J
通讯作者：
Kavanagh, J
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Milne, S;Sheeran, P;Orbell, S
通讯作者：
Orbell, S
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Papaioannou, Diana;Sutton, Anthea;Wong, Ruth
通讯作者：
Wong, Ruth