Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities.
Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986075
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Sindic, Denis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carmona, Margarida;Guerra, Rita;Dovidio, John F.;Hofhuis, Joep;Sindic, Denis
关键词：
先前的研究表明，包罗万象的上位类别，如“世界公民”和“人类”，可能代表不同的社会心理现实。然而，目前尚不清楚不同类别的使用是否可以解释不同的心理过程以及态度或行为结果。两项研究扩展了以前的研究，比较了这些类别的认知代表，以及它们对从东道国社区到移民的群体间帮助的影响。在一项相关性研究中，来自25个国家的168名国民认为移民群体比他们的国家群体更具有上位类别“世界公民”的原型性（相对外群体原型性），而“人类”类别的原型性没有差异。认同“世界公民”与反对帮助移民和提供以依赖为导向的帮助的倾向呈正相关。然而，与“人类”的认同与一般的帮助呈正相关，并提供依赖性和依赖性为导向的帮助;和负相关的反对帮助。这项实验性研究在来自36个国家的224名国民中操纵了“世界公民”与“人类”与对照组之间的显着性。结果表明，“人类”（与“世界公民”）的显着性引发更高的实体性和本质主义的看法，和双重身份表征。没有发现显着性的差异，由于代表相对内组原型或帮助的反应。总的来说，这些研究结果表明，不同标签的可互换使用是有问题的，考虑到这些标签可能会激活不同的表征，因此，在某些情况下，可能会导致不同的态度或行为结果。
Previous research suggests that all-inclusive superordinate categories, such as “citizens of the world” and “humans,” may represent different socio-psychological realities. Yet it remains unclear whether the use of different categories may account for different psychological processes and attitudinal or behavioral outcomes. Two studies extended previous research by comparing how these categories are cognitively represented, and their impact on intergroup helping from host communities toward migrants. In a correlational study, 168 nationals from 25 countries perceived the group of migrants as more prototypical of the superordinate category “citizens of the world” than their national group (relative outgroup prototypicality), whereas no differences in prototypicality occurred for the category “humans.” Identification with “citizens of the world” was positively associated with a disposition to oppose helping migrants and to offer dependency-oriented help. However, identification with “humans” was positively associated with helping in general, and with offering dependency- and autonomy-oriented help; and negatively associated with opposition to helping. The experimental study manipulated the salience of “citizens of the world” vs. “humans” vs. control category, among 224 nationals from 36 countries. Results showed that the salience of “humans” (vs. “citizens of the world”) triggered higher entitativity and essentialist perceptions, and dual-identity representations. No differences due to salience were found for representations of relative ingroup prototypicality or helping responses. Overall, these findings suggest that the interchangeable use of different labels is problematic, considering these might activate different representations, and thus, are likely to lead, in some circumstances, to different attitudinal or behavioral outcomes.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1037/a0020168
发表时间：
2010-07-01
期刊：
The American psychologist
影响因子：
--
作者：
通讯作者：
--
影响因子：
4
作者：
Crisp, RJ;Stone, CH;Hall, NR
通讯作者：
Hall, NR
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Bastian, Brock;Haslam, Nick
通讯作者：
Haslam, Nick
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Bilewicz, Michal;Bilewicz, Aleksandra
通讯作者：
Bilewicz, Aleksandra
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Guerra, Rita;Rebelo, Margarida;Gaertner, Samuel L.
通讯作者：
Gaertner, Samuel L.