Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.
Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/hex.13344
复制
发表时间：
2021-12
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Normandin L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clavel N;Paquette J;Dumez V;Del Grande C;Ghadiri DPS;Pomey MP;Normandin L
患者参与护理是临床实践的优先事项和关键组成部分。已经引入了不同的护理方法来促进患者的参与。最近缺乏对评估与患者参与护理相关的主要概念和维度的工具的综述。我们的范围审查旨在映射和总结最近验证的工具，用于评估患者参与护理的各种概念和维度。在4个数据库（奥维德Medline、奥维德EMBASE、科克伦系统综述数据库、CINAHL‐EBSCO）中对描述评估患者参与护理的偏好和经验的工具的近期同行评审文章进行了范围审查。我们采用了基于患者参与护理的主要概念的广泛定义：以患者为中心，赋权，共同决策和护理伙伴关系。在发现的2161篇文章中，有16篇描述了不同的工具，并进行了分析。共同决策和以患者为中心是评估的两个主要概念，通常在大多数工具中同时进行。只有四个量表同时测量以患者为中心，赋权和共同决策，但没有工具测量护理伙伴关系的核心维度。大多数工具在开发或验证过程中不包括患者，或者只是在验证阶段咨询患者。从开发到验证，没有与患者共同构建的工具，可用于同时评估患者参与护理的主要概念和维度。这份手稿是与一位耐心的专家一起准备的，他是作者之一。Vincent Dumez是患者专家，也是与患者和公众合作卓越中心的联合主任，他为手稿的准备做出了贡献。
Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care. Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care. A scoping review of recent peer‐reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL‐EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient‐centredness, empowerment, shared decision‐making and partnership in care. Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision‐making and patient‐centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient‐centredness, empowerment and shared decision‐making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time. This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Fridberg H;Wallin L;Wallengren C;Kottorp A;Forsman H;Tistad M
通讯作者：
Tistad M
影响因子：
3
作者：
Handley SC;Bell S;Nembhard IM
通讯作者：
Nembhard IM
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Berg, Selina Kikkenborg;Faerch, Jane;Christensen, Anne Vinggaard
通讯作者：
Christensen, Anne Vinggaard
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Grady, Patricia A.;Gough, Lisa Lucio
通讯作者：
Gough, Lisa Lucio
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-030-14101-1_2
发表时间：
2019-01-01
期刊：
PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: HOW PATIENT-PROVIDER PARTNERSHIPS TRANSFORM HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dumez, Vincent;Pomey, Marie-Pascale
通讯作者：
Pomey, Marie-Pascale