Comparison of the Conformations of KRAS Isoforms, K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B, Points to Similarities and Significant Differences.
Comparison of the Conformations of KRAS Isoforms, K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B, Points to Similarities and Significant Differences.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11110
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-04
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nussinov R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chakrabarti M;Jang H;Nussinov R
Human HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS genes encode four isoforms of Ras, a p21 GTPase. Mutations in KRAS account for the majority of RAS-driven cancers. The KRAS has two splice variants, K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B. Due to their reversible palmitoylation, K-Ras4A and N-Ras have bimodal signaling states. K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B differ in four catalytic domain residues (G151R/D153E/K165Q/H166Y) and in their disordered C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR). In K-Ras4A, the HVR is not as strongly positively charged as in K-Ras4B (+6e vs +9e). Here, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to elucidate isoform-specific differences between the two splice variants. We observe that the catalytic domain of GDP-bound K-Ras4A has a more exposed nucleotide binding pocket than K-Ras4B, and the dynamic fluctuations in switch I and II regions also differ; both factors may influence guanine–nucleotide exchange. We further observe that like K-Kas4B, full-length K-Ras4A exhibits nucleotide-dependent HVR fluctuations; however, these fluctuations differ between the GDP-bound forms of K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B. Unlike K-Ras4B where the HVR tends to cover the effector binding region, in K-Ras4A, autoinhibited states are unstable. With lesser charge, the K-Ras4A HVR collapses on itself, making it less available for binding the catalytic domain. Since the HVRs of N- and H-Ras are weakly charged (+1e and +2e, respectively), autoinhibition may be a unique feature of K-Ras4B.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1038/nrm3255
发表时间:
2011-12-22
期刊:
Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Ford, B;Skowronek, K;Nassar, N
通讯作者:
Nassar, N
影响因子:
--
作者:
Arozarena, Imanol;Calvo, Fernando;Crespo, Piero
通讯作者:
Crespo, Piero
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Clyde-Smith, J;Silins, G;Hancock, JF
通讯作者:
Hancock, JF
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Eargle, John;Luthey-Schulten, Zaida
通讯作者:
Luthey-Schulten, Zaida