Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARD Utilization in the United States: Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARD Utilization in the United States: Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s40744-021-00357-1
复制
发表时间:
2021-12
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Furst DE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Holdsworth EA;Donaghy B;Fox KM;Desai P;Collier DH;Furst DE
In patients with inadequate response or intolerance to first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), guidelines recommend switching to an agent of different mechanism of action or to another bDMARD. However, the reasons behind switching between bDMARD/targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD are not well documented in many studies. The objective of this study was to assess the rheumatologists’ perceptions and behaviors towards choice of initial b/tsDMARD treatment and reasons for switching between bDMARDs/tsDMARDs, in the context of present treatment patterns. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from the 12th Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Qualified rheumatologists involved in treatment decision-making for ≥ 10 patients a month completed patient record forms (PRFs). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with RA diagnosis and receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD were included. The outcomes assessed were proportion of patients receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD at molecule and class levels; rheumatologist-reported reasons for choice of therapy; proportion of patients who switched bDMARDs/tsDMARDs; and rheumatologist-reported reasons for switching therapies. Eighty-six rheumatologists completed PRFs for 1027 patients. Of these, 621 were receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD at data collection. The majority (73%) of patients received first-line bDMARD/tsDMARD, and at first-line, 68% received a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and 21% received a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi). The response option of strong overall efficacy was the primary reason for selecting first-line and second-line bDMARD/tsDMARD. A total of 163 patients had switched from first-line b/tsDMARD to second-line b/tsDMARD therapy. Of these, 44, 28, and 17% had switched from TNFi to another TNFi, TNFi to non-TNF biologic, and TNFi to JAKi, respectively. Lack of efficacy and worsening disease were the most frequent reasons for switching therapies. TNFis remain the most prescribed b/tsDMARD for first-line and second-line treatments. Strong overall efficacy was the primary reason for selecting therapy and loss of efficacy was the primary reason for switching therapy. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00357-1.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Youssef, Peter;Marcal, Bruno;Littlejohn, Geoff
通讯作者:
Littlejohn, Geoff
影响因子:
4
作者:
Hunter, Theresa M.;Boytsov, Natalie N.;Araujo, Andre B.
通讯作者:
Araujo, Andre B.
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Narongroeknawin, Pongthorn;Chevaisrakul, Parawee;Katchamart, Wanruchada
通讯作者:
Katchamart, Wanruchada
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Anderson, P.;Benford, M.;Piercy, J.
通讯作者:
Piercy, J.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Fraenkel, Liana;Bathon, Joan M.;England, Bryant R.;St Clair, E. William;Arayssi, Thurayya;Carandang, Kristine;Deane, Kevin D.;Genovese, Mark;Huston, Kent Kwas;Kerr, Gail;Kremer, Joel;Nakamura, Mary C.;Russell, Linda A.;Singh, Jasvinder A.;Smith, Benjamin J.;Sparks, Jeffrey A.;Venkatachalam, Shilpa;Weinblatt, Michael E.;Al-Gibbawi, Mounir;Baker, Joshua F.;Barbour, Kamil E.;Barton, Jennifer L.;Cappelli, Laura;Chamseddine, Fatimah;George, Michael;Johnson, Sindhu R.;Kahale, Lara;Karam, Basil S.;Khamis, Assem M.;Navarro-Millan, Iris;Mirza, Reza;Schwab, Pascale;Singh, Namrata;Turgunbaev, Marat;Turner, Amy S.;Yaacoub, Sally;Akl, Elie A.
通讯作者:
Akl, Elie A.