Mindfulness and Emotional Outcomes: Identifying Subgroups of College Students using Latent Profile Analysis.

Mindfulness and Emotional Outcomes: Identifying Subgroups of College Students using Latent Profile Analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.009
复制
发表时间:
2015-04-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Bravo AJ
Bravo AJ
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pearson MR;Lawless AK;Brown DB;Bravo AJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在非冥想的样本中,正念的不同方面被发现是负相关的,阻止了有意义的正念总分的创造。这项研究使用了以人为中心的分析,根据大学生的正念得分来区分他们的亚群,这使得可以检查在正念的所有方面都高(或低)的个体。使用Lo-Mendell-Rubin调整后的LRT测验,我们确定了一个4级解决方案,包括高正念组(所有5个维度都高,N=245),低正念组(所有5个维度都中等低,N=563),判断观察组(高观察,但低非判断和有意识的行动,N=63),非判断意识组(低观察,但高不判断和行动有意识,N=70)。在包括抑郁症状、焦虑症状(即担忧)、情绪不稳定和痛苦不耐受在内的所有情绪结果中,我们发现判断观察组的情绪结果最不适应,其次是正念不集中组。无论是高度正念组还是非判断性觉察组,情绪结果的适应性都最强。我们讨论了以人为中心的分析对探索正念的影响,因为它与重要的心理健康结果有关。
In non-meditating samples, distinct facets of mindfulness are found to be negatively correlated, preventing the meaningful creation of a total mindfulness score. The present study used person-centered analyses to distinguish subgroups of college students based on their mindfulness scores, which allows the examination of individuals who are high (or low) on all facets of mindfulness. Using the Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted LRT test, we settled on a 4-class solution that included a high mindfulness group (high on all 5 facets, N = 245), low mindfulness group (moderately low on all 5 facets, N = 563), judgmentally observing group (high on observing, but low on non-judging and acting with awareness, N =63), and non-judgmentally aware group (low on observing, but high on non-judging and acting with awareness, N =70). Consistent across all emotional outcomes including depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms (i.e., worry), affective instability, and distress intolerance, we found that the judgmentally observing group had the most maladaptive emotional outcomes followed by the low mindfulness group. Both the high mindfulness group and the non-judgmentally aware group had the most adaptive emotional outcomes. We discuss the implications of person-centered analyses to exploring mindfulness as it relates to important psychological health outcomes.
DOI: 10.1037/a0018441
发表时间: 2010-02
期刊: EMOTION
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Goldin, Philippe R.;Gross, James J.
通讯作者: Gross, James J.
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1974.1100705
发表时间: 1974-01-01
影响因子: 6.8
作者:
AKAIKE, H
通讯作者: AKAIKE, H
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.032
发表时间: 2011-12
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Barnhofer T;Duggan DS;Griffith JW
通讯作者: Griffith JW
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.001
发表时间: 2013-09
期刊: Behavior therapy
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Desrosiers A;Klemanski DH;Nolen-Hoeksema S
通讯作者: Nolen-Hoeksema S
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006
发表时间: 2011-08
影响因子: 12.8
作者:
Keng, Shian-Ling;Smoski, Mona J.;Robins, Clive J.
通讯作者: Robins, Clive J.