US public support for vaccine donation to poorer countries in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
US public support for vaccine donation to poorer countries in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0033025
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Hilyard KM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kumar S;Quinn SC;Kim KH;Hilyard KM
在2009年H1N1流感大流行期间，全球卫生界寻求“在与发达国家相同的时间框架内”在发展中国家提供疫苗。然而，较富裕的国家向制造商提前订购，使较贫穷的国家依赖于制造商和富裕国家捐赠疫苗的数量和时间。在下一次大流行期间，了解公众对及时捐款的支持可能对决策者很重要。我们探讨了美国公众对本国向较贫穷国家捐赠疫苗的看法。我们在2010年1月22日至2月1日期间调查了2079名美国成年人，了解他们对向贫穷国家捐赠疫苗的看法。收入（p = 0.014）、客观优先地位（p = 0.005）、出生地、党派关系和政治意识形态（p<0.001）与捐赠疫苗数量的观点显著相关。 虽然党派关系和政治意识形态与捐赠疫苗的意愿有关（p<0.001），但两党都支持及时捐赠美国疫苗供应的10%，以便“贫困国家的风险人群可以与美国的风险人群同时获得疫苗”。我们建议美国和其他发达国家在新的流行病出现之前，通过教育和公众讨论来加强对这一问题的支持，因为情绪反应可能会影响对捐赠的支持。我们的结论是，鉴于我们的证据两党支持及时捐款，它可能是必要的设计多个参数，从功利到道德，以加强公众和政策制定者对捐款的支持。
During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, the global health community sought to make vaccine available “in developing nations in the same timeframe as developed nations.” However, richer nations placed advance orders with manufacturers, leaving poorer nations dependent on the quantity and timing of vaccine donations by manufacturers and rich nations. Knowledge of public support for timely donations could be important to policy makers during the next pandemic. We explored what the United States (US) public believes about vaccine donation by its country to poorer countries. We surveyed 2079 US adults between January 22nd and February 1st 2010 about their beliefs regarding vaccine donation to poorer countries. Income (p = 0.014), objective priority status (p = 0.005), nativity, party affiliation, and political ideology (p<0.001) were significantly related to views on the amount of vaccine to be donated. Though party affiliation and political ideology were related to willingness to donate vaccine (p<0.001), there was bipartisan support for timely donations of 10% of the US vaccine supply so that those “at risk in poorer countries can get the vaccine at the same time” as those at risk in the US. We suggest that the US and other developed nations would do well to bolster support with education and public discussion on this issue prior to an emerging pandemic when emotional reactions could potentially influence support for donation. We conclude that given our evidence for bipartisan support for timely donations, it may be necessary to design multiple arguments, from utilitarian to moral, to strengthen public and policy makers' support for donations.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Schwarzinger M;Flicoteaux R;Cortarenoda S;Obadia Y;Moatti JP
通讯作者：
Moatti JP
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Woodle, D
通讯作者：
Woodle, D