Construct validation of narrative coherence: Exploring links with personality functioning and psychopathology.

Construct validation of narrative coherence: Exploring links with personality functioning and psychopathology.
复制标题

构建叙事连贯性的验证:探索与人格功能和精神病理学的联系。

DOI:
10.1037/per0000508
复制
发表时间:
2022-09
期刊:
Personality disorders
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Simms LJ
Simms LJ
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dimitrova J;Simms LJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

叙事连贯性是个体自我意识的统一性的指标--将过去的自我与现在的自我融为一体,并允许他们为未来追求有意义的目标。它已经通过《生活故事》访谈进行了评估。人格功能被用来描述一个人发展稳定和完整的自我和他人表征的能力,以及他们发展和保持稳定的、亲密的和附属的关系,以及有意义地移情他人的能力。我们在一个精神病学样本(N=134)中研究了叙事连贯性(基于生活故事访谈)和人格功能之间的联系(由临床医生使用人格功能量表的水平进行评分),并更广泛地研究了围绕叙事连贯性的法律学网络。与预测相反的是,结果显示,叙事连贯性并不是人格功能的标志。然而,我们发现了叙事连贯性与外倾性和心理社会功能的测量之间存在关联的证据。这项研究代表了将叙事同一性与人格病理学和精神病理学的经验性结构模型相结合的重要一步。并讨论了对未来研究的启示。
Narrative coherence serves as an index of the unity in an individual’s sense of self—integrating their past self with their present self and allowing them to pursue meaningful goals for their future. It has been assessed using the Life Story Interview. Personality functioning is used to describe an individual’s ability to develop stable and integrated representations of the self and others, as well as their ability to develop and maintain stable, intimate, and affiliative relationships, and meaningfully empathize with others. We studied the links between narrative coherence (based on Life Story Interviews) and personality functioning (as indexed by clinician ratings using the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale) in a psychiatric sample (N = 134), and more generally studied the nomological net surrounding narrative coherence. Contrary to predictions, results revealed that narrative coherence does not serve as a marker of personality functioning. However, we found evidence of an association between narrative coherence and measures of extraversion and psychosocial functioning. This study represents an important step in integrating narrative identity with empirically-derived structural models of personality pathology and psychopathology. Implications for future research are discussed.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.01.001
发表时间: 2018-06-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Adler, Jonathan M.;Waters, Theodore E. A.;Seitz, Sophia
通讯作者: Seitz, Sophia
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.006
发表时间: 2007-12-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Adler, Jonathan M.;Wagner, Joshua W.;McAdams, Dan P.
通讯作者: McAdams, Dan P.
DOI: 10.1080/10503300802326020
发表时间: 2008-01-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Adler, Jonathan M.;Skalina, Lauren M.;McAdams, Dan P.
通讯作者: McAdams, Dan P.
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5503
发表时间: 1990-12-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
ZIMET, GD;POWELL, SS;BERKOFF, KA
通讯作者: BERKOFF, KA
DOI: 10.1037/per0000063
发表时间: 2014-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Clark, Lee Anna;Ro, Eunyoe
通讯作者: Ro, Eunyoe