News Coverage of Climate Change in Nature News and ScienceNOW during 2007
News Coverage of Climate Change in Nature News and ScienceNOW during 2007
复制标题
2007 年《Nature News》和《ScienceNOW》中气候变化的新闻报道
DOI：
10.1080/17524032.2010.520722
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rikke Schmidt Kjærgaard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Nielsen;Rikke Schmidt Kjærgaard
过去十年，气候变化已成为大众媒体、政治话语和科学讨论中最受欢迎的话题之一。到2007年底，科学杂志《科学》和《自然》都强调了认识气候变化及其严重后果和人为原因的重要性和必要性，从而表明了气候变化的紧迫性。在那一年里，这两份期刊的在线新闻服务《自然新闻》和《科学现在》将气候变化框架化，以适应特定的议程，导致明显不同的叙述。这篇文章表明，与ScienceNOW相比，《自然新闻》对气候变化的政治决策、科学成果和社会问题的报道更具批判性。在不同的制度约束下运作，ScienceNOW通常采取更谨慎的路线。从文本和视觉分析中得出的证据表明，科学期刊的新闻部分在构建科学报道以适应特定议程方面与大众媒体非常相似。
Climate change has become one of the most favored topics in mass media, political discourses, and scientific discussions during the past decade. By the end of 2007 the scientific journals Science and Nature both demonstrated the urgency of climate change by emphasizing the importance and necessity of appreciating climate change, its severe consequences, and its anthropogenic causes. During that year the two journals' online news services Nature News and ScienceNOW framed climate change to fit particular agendas resulting in markedly different narratives. This article demonstrates that Nature News reported more critically on political decisions, scientific results, and social matters of climate change compared to ScienceNOW. Operating under different institutional constraints ScienceNOW generally took a more cautious line. The evidence drawn from both textual and visual analyses shows that news sections run by scientific journals are very similar to mass media in framing their coverage of science to fit specific agendas.
影响因子：
14.6
作者：
Martijn Gough
通讯作者：
Martijn Gough