The Robustness of Laboratory Gift Exchange: A Reconsideration ¤

The Robustness of Laboratory Gift Exchange: A Reconsideration ¤
复制标题

实验室礼品交换的稳健性:重新思考 ¤

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Ortmann
A. Ortmann
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dirk Engelmann;A. Ortmann

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们报告了一个礼物交换实验,在这个实验中,我们系统地改变了以下实验设计和实施特征:平衡的选择(内部与角落点),潜在的效率增益的程度,以及框架的选择(抽象与雇主-工人)。我们还采用了一种匹配机制,已被证明可以最好地保留一次性交互(旋转)的性质。我们观察到的参与者,尤其是反应者的大部分游戏都处于或接近平衡状态。因此,我们的研究结果与文献中报道的大部分结果形成鲜明对比。具体来说,我们发现很少有证据表明积极互惠,但有大量证据表明消极互惠。我们的研究结果表明,实验室礼物交换是高度敏感的参数化模型和实施特点和问题的共同信念,信任和互惠是强大的现象。
We report a gift exchange experiment in which we systematically vary the following experimental design and implementation characteristics: the choice of equilibrium (interior versus corner point), the extent of potential e¢ciency gains, and the choice of frames (abstract versus employer-worker). We also employ a matching mechanism that has been shown to best preserve the nature of one-shot interactions (rotation). Much of the observed play of our participants, especially responders, is at or close to equilibrium. Our results therefore stand in stark contrast to much of what has been reported in the literature. Specifically, we …nd little evidence for positive reciprocity but substantial evidence for negative reciprocity. Our results suggest that laboratory gift exchange is highly sensitive to the parameterization of the model and implementation characteristics and question the common belief that trust and reciprocity are robust phenomena.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.582
发表时间: 1996-07-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Kahneman, D;Tversky, A
通讯作者: Tversky, A
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.677
发表时间: 1999-11-01
影响因子: 22.4
作者:
Eisenberger, R;Pierce, WD;Cameron, J
通讯作者: Cameron, J