Quantitative and Structural Assessment of Histone Methyllysine Analogue Engagement by Cognate Binding Proteins Reveals Affinity Decrements Relative to Those of Native Counterparts.
Quantitative and Structural Assessment of Histone Methyllysine Analogue Engagement by Cognate Binding Proteins Reveals Affinity Decrements Relative to Those of Native Counterparts.
复制标题
同源结合蛋白对组蛋白甲基苷类似物参与的定量和结构评估揭示了相对于天然对应物的亲和力的降低。
DOI:
10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00926
复制
发表时间:
2018-01-23
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Ruthenburg AJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen Z;Notti RQ;Ueberheide B;Ruthenburg AJ
Methyllysine analogs (MLAs), furnished by aminoethylation of engineered cysteine residues, are widely used surrogates of histone methyllysine and are considered to be effective proxies for studying these epigenetic marks in vitro. Here we report the first structure of a trimethyllysine MLA histone in complex with a protein binding partner, quantify the thermodynamic distinctions between MLAs and their native methyllysine counterparts, and demonstrate that these differences can compromise qualitative interpretations of binding at the nucleosome-level. Quantitative measurements with two methyllysine-binding protein modules reveal substantial affinity losses for the MLA peptides versus the corresponding native methyllysine species in both cases, although the thermodynamic underpinnings are distinct. MLA and methyllysine adopt distinct conformational geometries when in complex the BPTF PHD finger, a well-established H3K4me3 binding partner. In this case, a ~13-fold Kd difference at the peptide-level translates to nucleosomal affinities for MLA analogs that fall outside of the detectable range in a pull-down format, whereas the methyllysine species installed by native chemical ligation demonstrates robust binding. Thus, despite their facile production and commercial availability, there is a significant caveat of potentially altered binding affinity when MLAs are used in place of native methyllysine residues.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
van Nuland R;van Schaik FM;Simonis M;van Heesch S;Cuppen E;Boelens R;Timmers HM;van Ingen H
通讯作者:
van Ingen H
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Chen, Zhonglei;Grzybowski, Adrian T.;Ruthenburg, Alexander J.
通讯作者:
Ruthenburg, Alexander J.
影响因子:
48
作者:
Nguyen, Uyen T. T.;Bittoval, Lenka;Mueller, Manuel M.;Fierz, Beat;David, Yael;Houck-Loomis, Brian;Feng, Vanessa;Dann, Geoffrey P.;Muir, Tom W.
通讯作者:
Muir, Tom W.
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Ruthenburg AJ;Li H;Milne TA;Dewell S;McGinty RK;Yuen M;Ueberheide B;Dou Y;Muir TW;Patel DJ;Allis CD
通讯作者:
Allis CD
影响因子:
16.8
作者:
Musselman, Catherine A.;Lalonde, Marie-Eve;Cote, Jacques;Kutateladze, Tatiana G.
通讯作者:
Kutateladze, Tatiana G.