Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing
Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing
复制标题
轻罪之地：破窗警务时代的刑事法庭和社会控制
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Issa Kohler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Issa Kohler
低级轻罪程序是一个强大的社会法律制度，它既调节又产生不平等。与此同时，轻罪法律处理往往忽视许多基本的刑事司法价值观，例如正当程序、证据，甚至个人有罪。这些特征是相互关联的：法治的侵蚀是轻罪制度针对弱势群体而非仅仅有罪者的具体机制之一。伊萨·科勒-豪斯曼在《轻罪之地》一书中描述了纽约市轻罪法律程序的不平等运作方式，以及它如何作为对弱势群体的管理社会控制系统运作，即使它没有对他们定罪和监禁。这篇评论总结了该书对新兴的轻罪学术讨论的关键贡献，然后扩展了对纽约的见解，以阐明美国轻罪程序的更广泛的动态和民主意义。作者。加州大学尔湾法学院法学教授。特别感谢 Guy-Uriel Charles、Sharon Dolovich、Mona Lynch 和 Doug NeJaime。我还要感谢《耶鲁大学法律杂志》编辑们的出色工作。第1649章 低级刑事司法的高风险 书评内容介绍 1650 一．国家视角下的轻罪挑战：贬低弱势群体的正当程序 1659 ii．第 1665 章惩罚范围：从管理主义到传统惩罚 1677 iv．对管理妥协的对抗性采取 1682 A. 轻罪处理中的吉迪恩 1683 B. 破窗警务中的检方共谋 1686 C. 工作中的纽约对抗系统 1689 诉轻罪司法？ 1692 A. 法治的公平重要性 1694 B. 管理不公正 1697 结论：宽大处理谬误 1702 耶鲁大学法律杂志 128:1648 2019
The low-level misdemeanor process is a powerful socio-legal institution that both regulates and generates inequality. At the same time, misdemeanor legal processing often ignores many foundational criminal justice values such as due process, evidence, and even individual guilt. These features are linked: the erosion of the rule of law is one of the concrete mechanisms enabling the misdemeanor system to take aim at the disadvantaged, rather than at the merely guilty. In the book Misdemeanorland, Issa Kohler-Hausmann describes the inegalitarian workings of the misdemeanor legal process in New York City and how it operates as a system of managerial social control over the disadvantaged even when it stops short of convicting and incarcerating them. This Review summarizes the book’s key contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on misdemeanors and then extends its insights about New York to illuminate the broader dynamics and democratic significance of the U.S. misdemeanor process. author. Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law. Special thanks to Guy-Uriel Charles, Sharon Dolovich, Mona Lynch, and Doug NeJaime. My thanks also to the editors of the Yale Law Journal for their excellent work. the high stakes of low-level criminal justice 1649 book review contents introduction 1650 i. the misdemeanor challenge in national perspective: devaluing due process for the disadvantaged 1659 ii. new york city 1665 A. The Legal System’s Response to Broken-Windows Policing 1665 B. Mapping Managerialism: Marking, Procedural Hassle, and Performance 1672 iii. the punitive spectrum: from managerialism to conventional punishment 1677 iv. an adversarial take on the managerial compromise 1682 A. Gideon in Misdemeanor Processing 1683 B. Prosecutorial Complicity in Broken-Windows Policing 1686 C. The New York Adversarial System at Work 1689 v. misdemeanor justice? 1692 A. The Equitable Importance of the Rule of Law 1694 B. Managerial Injustices 1697 conclusion: the leniency fallacy 1702 the yale law journal 128:1648 2019
惩罚时代的改造：美国监狱计划中言辞与现实之间的差距。
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Phelps,MichelleS
通讯作者：
Phelps,MichelleS