Escape From Treatment; the Different Faces of Leukemic Stem Cells and Therapy Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Escape From Treatment; the Different Faces of Leukemic Stem Cells and Therapy Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
复制标题
逃避治疗;急性髓系白血病白血病干细胞的不同面貌及其治疗耐药性。
DOI:
10.3389/fonc.2021.659253
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Smit L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
van Gils N;Denkers F;Smit L
Standard induction chemotherapy, consisting of an anthracycline and cytarabine, has been the first-line therapy for many years to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although this treatment induces complete remissions in the majority of patients, many face a relapse (adaptive resistance) or have refractory disease (primary resistance). Moreover, older patients are often unfit for cytotoxic-based treatment. AML relapse is due to the survival of therapy-resistant leukemia cells (minimal residual disease, MRD). Leukemia cells with stem cell features, named leukemic stem cells (LSCs), residing within MRD are thought to be at the origin of relapse initiation. It is increasingly recognized that leukemia “persisters” are caused by intra-leukemic heterogeneity and non-genetic factors leading to plasticity in therapy response. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, combined with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine, represents an important new therapy especially for older AML patients. However, often there is also a small population of AML cells refractory to venetoclax treatment. As AML MRD reflects the sum of therapy resistance mechanisms, the different faces of treatment “persisters” and LSCs might be exploited to reach an optimal therapy response and prevent the initiation of relapse. Here, we describe the different epigenetic, transcriptional, and metabolic states of therapy sensitive and resistant AML (stem) cell populations and LSCs, how these cell states are influenced by the microenvironment and affect treatment outcome of AML. Moreover, we discuss potential strategies to target dynamic treatment resistance and LSCs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
28.2
作者:
Cai SF;Chu SH;Goldberg AD;Parvin S;Koche RP;Glass JL;Stein EM;Tallman MS;Sen F;Famulare CA;Cusan M;Huang CH;Chen CW;Zou L;Cordner KB;DelGaudio NL;Durani V;Kini M;Rex M;Tian HS;Zuber J;Baslan T;Lowe SW;Rienhoff HY Jr;Letai A;Levine RL;Armstrong SA
通讯作者:
Armstrong SA
影响因子:
50.3
作者:
Abdel-Wahab O;Adli M;LaFave LM;Gao J;Hricik T;Shih AH;Pandey S;Patel JP;Chung YR;Koche R;Perna F;Zhao X;Taylor JE;Park CY;Carroll M;Melnick A;Nimer SD;Jaffe JD;Aifantis I;Bernstein BE;Levine RL
通讯作者:
Levine RL
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Eppert, Kolja;Takenaka, Katsuto;Dick, John E.
通讯作者:
Dick, John E.
影响因子:
50.3
作者:
Ebinger S;Özdemir EZ;Ziegenhain C;Tiedt S;Castro Alves C;Grunert M;Dworzak M;Lutz C;Turati VA;Enver T;Horny HP;Sotlar K;Parekh S;Spiekermann K;Hiddemann W;Schepers A;Polzer B;Kirsch S;Hoffmann M;Knapp B;Hasenauer J;Pfeifer H;Panzer-Grümayer R;Enard W;Gires O;Jeremias I
通讯作者:
Jeremias I
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Carey A;Edwards DK 5th;Eide CA;Newell L;Traer E;Medeiros BC;Pollyea DA;Deininger MW;Collins RH;Tyner JW;Druker BJ;Bagby GC;McWeeney SK;Agarwal A
通讯作者:
Agarwal A