Measuring parent strategy use in early intervention: Reliability and validity of the Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Fidelity Rating Scale across strategy types.
Measuring parent strategy use in early intervention: Reliability and validity of the Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Fidelity Rating Scale across strategy types.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1177/13623613211015003
复制
发表时间:
2021-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Roberts MY
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sone BJ;Kaat AJ;Roberts MY
Children with autism spectrum disorder benefit from early, intensive interventions to improve social communication, and parent-implemented interventions are a feasible, family-centered way to increase treatment dosage. The success of such interventions is dependent on a parent’s ability to implement the strategies with fidelity. However, measurement of parent strategy use varies across studies. Most studies use one of two types of observational coding measures (macro and micro-coding). Macro-codes are known for being efficient while micro-codes are known for being precise. The present study evaluates the reliability and validity of the NDBI-Fi, a macro-code, compared to a micro-code. Parent-child interaction videos for 177 participants were used to compare these measures. Results demonstrated that the NDBI-Fi had strong interrater reliability. It also had strong convergent validity with the micro-code after intervention. In addition, the NDBI-Fi was sensitive to change, and it demonstrated precision comparable to the micro-code. Furthermore, a novel scoring procedure detected differences in parents who learned different intervention strategy types. However, the NDBI-Fi did not demonstrate strong validity before intervention, particularly when measuring responsive intervention strategies. Taken together, findings support the use of the NDBI-Fi as an outcome measure, and future work should focus on continued development of valid pre-intervention macro-codes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Barton, Erin E.;Fettig, Angel
通讯作者:
Fettig, Angel
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Schreibman L;Dawson G;Stahmer AC;Landa R;Rogers SJ;McGee GG;Kasari C;Ingersoll B;Kaiser AP;Bruinsma Y;McNerney E;Wetherby A;Halladay A
通讯作者:
Halladay A
DOI:
10.1044/2018_jslhr-l-18-0079
发表时间:
2019-01-01
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Roberts, Megan Y.
通讯作者:
Roberts, Megan Y.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Virues-Ortega, Javier;Montano-Fidalgo, Montserrat;Calero-Elvira, Ana
通讯作者:
Calero-Elvira, Ana
DOI:
10.1007/s11121-016-0697-5
发表时间:
2017-04
期刊:
Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dishion TJ;Mun CJ;Tein JY;Kim H;Shaw DS;Gardner F;Wilson MN;Peterson J
通讯作者:
Peterson J