Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and feels good
Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and feels good
复制标题
选择任务的匹配偏差：速度快且感觉良好
DOI：
10.1080/13546783.2013.820220
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Jamie I. D. Campbell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Thompson;Jonathan Evans;Jamie I. D. Campbell
我们测试了一个假设，即由第一类过程决定的选择是令人信服的，因为它们是流畅的，因此它们比其他答案更不受分析思维的影响。共有104名参与者完成了沃森选择任务的修改版本，其中他们使用双反应范式一次对一张卡片做出决定。在这个范例中，参与者给出了一个快速、直观的回答，对他们的回答的正确性（FOR）打分，然后被允许有空闲时间重新考虑他们的答案。正如我们所预测的那样，与匹配启发式（即选择规则中指定的卡片）一致的答案比其他答案更快，获得更高的FOR评级，并且通过重新思考时间和更改答案的概率来衡量，得到的后续分析较少。这些数据表明，推理偏差之所以引人注目，可能是因为它们是流畅生成的；这就产生了一个强烈的FOR，它作为一个信号，表明进一步的分析是没有必要的。
We tested the hypothesis that choices determined by Type 1 processes are compelling because they are fluent, and for this reason they are less subject to analytic thinking than other answers. A total of 104 participants completed a modified version of Wason's selection task wherein they made decisions about one card at a time using a two-response paradigm. In this paradigm participants gave a fast, intuitive response, rated their feeling of rightness (FOR) for that response, and were then allowed free time to reconsider their answers. As we predicted, answers consistent with a matching heuristic (i.e., selecting cards named in the rule) were made more quickly than other answers, were given higher FOR ratings, and received less subsequent analysis as measured by rethinking time and the probability of changing answers. These data suggest that reasoning biases may be compelling because they are fluently generated; this is turn creates a strong FOR, which acts as a signal that further analysis is not necessary.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
BARON, J;HERSHEY, JC
通讯作者：
HERSHEY, JC
DOI：
10.1037/h0087426
发表时间：
2003-09-01
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Masson, MEJ;Loftus, GR
通讯作者：
Loftus, GR