Debating nature’s value: epistemic strategy and struggle in the story of ‘ecosystem services’
Debating nature’s value: epistemic strategy and struggle in the story of ‘ecosystem services’
复制标题
辩论自然的价值：“生态系统服务”故事中的认知策略和斗争
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
J. Meadowcroft
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin P. A. Craig;H. Stevenson;J. Meadowcroft
摘要：我们研究了从 1950 年至今“生态系统服务”概念的起源和发展，追踪了不同历史时刻的不同认知共同体对该概念在当今环境政策辩论中所采用形式的影响。我们的政治和历史敏感方法（“概念传记”）强调概念发展的知识、政治和战略背景，以及它们关于价值基本性质（它们的“价值本体论”）的潜在本体论承诺的政治含义。在三个时期（1950年代-1970年代；1970年代-1990年代；2000年至今）的过程中，我们追溯了在这一概念的发展中至关重要的两个认知共同体的起源和出现，并研究了它们用来构建生态系统服务和更广泛的自然价值的价值本体。我们绘制了他们之间展开的辩论中的里程碑，以及包容性“价值多元主义”认知共同体与早期注入新古典主义的“经济功利主义”观点的日益突出。将每种价值本体视为一种政治策略形式，学术界通过这种策略在政策辩论中寻求促进保护的价值，最后我们考虑了每种价值本体增强环境治理自反性的能力。
ABSTRACT We examine the origins and development of the concept of ‘ecosystem services’ from 1950 to the present, tracing the impact of distinct epistemic communities at different historical moments on the form that the concept takes in environmental policy debates today. Our politically and historically sensitive approach (a ‘conceptual biography’) stresses the intellectual, political and strategic context in which concepts are developed and the political implications of their underlying ontological commitments concerning the fundamental nature of value (their ‘value ontologies’). Over the course of three periods (1950s–1970; 1970s–1990s; 2000-the present), we trace the origins and emergence of two epistemic communities that have been pivotal in the concept’s development, and examine the value ontologies through which they frame ecosystem services and the value of nature more broadly. We chart milestones in the debate that has unfolded between them, and the growing salience of an inclusive ‘value-pluralist’ epistemic community alongside the earlier neoclassical-infused ‘economic utilitarian’ perspective. Treating each value ontology as a form of political strategy by which academics seek to promote the value of conservation in policy debates, we conclude by considering the capacity of each to enhance reflexivity in environmental governance.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
S. Sullivan;M. Hannis
通讯作者：
S. Sullivan;M. Hannis
全球治理中多人的智慧：对多样性和包容性的认知民主捍卫
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Stevenson H
通讯作者：
Stevenson H
全球环境政治：问题、政策与实践
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Stevenson
通讯作者：
Stevenson