Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).
Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).
复制标题
实验室大鼠（褐家鼠）相互行为的功能分析。
DOI：
10.1037/com0000015
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hackenberg,TimothyD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tan,Lavinia;Hackenberg,TimothyD
三对大鼠进行训练，以同步他们的杠杆按下根据相互加强应急，其中交替杠杆按下，落在500毫秒的窗口加强与食物。在实验1中，大鼠工作在相邻的房间分开的透明屏障，和相互强化应急的影响进行了比较与那些在轭控制条件下，提供了相同的食物强化率，但没有时间协调反应的要求。在实验2中，协调的行为进行了比较，没有障碍，并跨越不同的障碍类型：透明的，不透明的，丝网。在实验3中，社会熟悉的影响进行了评估，切换合作伙伴，使协调行为与熟悉和不熟悉的合作伙伴进行比较。结果的总体模式表明，2只大鼠的协调行为（a）由相互强化的偶然事件维持，（B）与分隔大鼠的屏障的类型或存在无关，以及（c）足够灵活以适应不熟悉的伴侣的存在和行为。作为一个整体，这项研究说明了一个有前途的方法来概念化和分析相互行为的行为机制，一个社会行为的综合研究的重要组成部分。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Three pairs of rats were trained to synchronize their lever pressing according to a mutual reinforcement contingency, in which alternating lever presses that fell within a 500-ms window were reinforced with food. In Experiment 1, rats worked in adjacent chambers separated by a transparent barrier, and the effects of the mutual reinforcement contingency were compared with those under yoked-control conditions that provided the same rate of food reinforcement but without the temporal coordination response requirement. In Experiment 2, coordinated behavior was compared with and without a barrier, and across different barrier types: transparent, opaque, wire mesh. In Experiment 3, the effects of social familiarity were assessed by switching partners, enabling a comparison of coordinated behavior with familiar and unfamiliar partners. The overall pattern of results shows that the coordinated behavior of 2 rats was (a) maintained by mutual reinforcement contingencies,(b) unrelated to the type or presence of a barrier separating the rats, and (c) sufficiently flexible to adjust to the presence and behavior of an unfamiliar partner. Taken as a whole, the study illustrates a promising approach to conceptualizing and analyzing behavioral mechanisms of mutual behavior, an important component of an integrated study of social behavior.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Lopuch, Sylwia;Popik, Piotr
通讯作者：
Popik, Piotr
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1101765108
发表时间：
2011-03-22
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Plotnik, Joshua M.;Lair, Richard;de Waal, Frans B. M.
通讯作者：
de Waal, Frans B. M.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Braeuer, Juliane;Boes, Milena;Tomasello, Michael
通讯作者：
Tomasello, Michael
在不考虑合作伙伴行为的情况下解决合作任务：卷尾猴（Cebus apella）的案例。
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
E. Visalberghi;B. P. Quarantotti;F. Tranchida
通讯作者：
F. Tranchida
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
FLESHLER, M;HOFFMAN, HS
通讯作者：
HOFFMAN, HS