Executive function in chronic pain patients and healthy controls: different cortical activation during response inhibition in fibromyalgia.
Executive function in chronic pain patients and healthy controls: different cortical activation during response inhibition in fibromyalgia.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpain.2011.06.007
复制
发表时间:
2011-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Schmidt-Wilcke T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Glass JM;Williams DA;Fernandez-Sanchez ML;Kairys A;Barjola P;Heitzeg MM;Clauw DJ;Schmidt-Wilcke T
The primary symptom of fibromyalgia (FM) is chronic, widespread pain; however, patients report additional symptoms including decreased concentration and memory. Performance based deficits are seen mainly in tests of working memory and executive function. Neural correlates of executive function were investigated in 18 FM patients and 14 age-matched HCs during a simple go/no-go task (response inhibition) while they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Performance was not different between FM and HC, in either reaction time or accuracy. However, fMRI revealed that FM patients had lower activation in the right pre-motor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), mid cingulate cortex (MCC), putamen and, after controlling for anxiety, in the right insular cortex (IC) and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). A hyper-activation in FM patients was seen in the right inferior temporal gyrus/fusiform gyrus. Despite the same RTs and accuracy, FM patients show less brain activation in cortical structures in the inhibition network (specifically in areas involved in response selection/motor preparation) and the attention network along with increased activation in brain areas not normally part of the inhibition network. We hypothesize that response -inhibition and pain perception may rely on partially overlapping networks, and that in chronic pain patients resources taken up by pain processing may not be available for executive functioning tasks such as response inhibition. Compensatory cortical plasticity may be required to achieve performance on par with control groups.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Congdon, Eliza;Mumford, Jeanette A.;Cohen, Jessica R.;Galvan, Adriana;Aron, Adam R.;Xue, Gui;Miller, Eric;Poldrack, Russell A.
通讯作者:
Poldrack, Russell A.
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Heitzeg, Mary M.;Nigg, Joel T.;Yau, Wai-Ying Wendy;Zucker, Robert A.;Zubieta, Jon-Kar
通讯作者:
Zubieta, Jon-Kar
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Lin, Jin-Mann S;Brimmer, Dana J;Reeves, William C
通讯作者:
Reeves, William C
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Fales, C. L.;Barch, D. M.;Braver, T. S.
通讯作者:
Braver, T. S.
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Ericsson, Anna;Mannerkorpi, Kaisa
通讯作者:
Mannerkorpi, Kaisa