The SUMMIT Study: Utilising a written 'Next Steps' information booklet to prepare participants for potential lung cancer screening results and follow-up.
The SUMMIT Study: Utilising a written 'Next Steps' information booklet to prepare participants for potential lung cancer screening results and follow-up.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.12.006
复制
发表时间：
2023-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Janes SM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bhamani A;Horst C;Bojang F;Quaife SL;Dickson JL;Tisi S;Hall H;Verghese P;Creamer A;Prendecki R;McCabe J;Gyertson K;Bowyer V;El-Emir E;Cotton A;Mehta S;Levermore C;Mullin AM;Teague J;Farrelly L;Nair A;Devaraj A;Hackshaw A;SUMMIT consortium;Janes SM
肺癌的低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查可以导致几种不同意义的潜在结果。因此，肺癌筛查(LCS)方案中使用的沟通方法必须确保参与者为可能的结果和后续行动做好准备。在这里，我们评估了人们对提供给大型LCS队列参与者的书面准备信息手册的看法，该队列旨在传达这一信息。首脑会议研究报告(NCT03934866)的所有参与者都收到了一份成果准备资料手册，题为《首脑会议研究报告：下一步》，其中概述了潜在成果、其意义和后续行动的时间表。LDCT扫描和肺部健康检查的结果随后通过信件发送。对肺部发现不确定的参与者在三个月间隔扫描前立即参加面对面的预约时，评估了他们对这本手册的看法。具体地说，这些问题评估了人们认为小册子的用处和其中包含的信息量。70.1%(n=1,412/2,014)的参与者记得在预约时收到了小册子。在这些参与者中，72.0%(n=1,017/1,412)认为它相当有用或非常有用，68.0%(n=960/1,412)报告说它包含了适当数量的信息。年长的参与者、来自最贫困的社会经济五分之一的人和黑人族裔的人不太可能报告说，他们认为小册子相当有用或非常有用，或者它包含了适当数量的信息。记得收到小册子的参与者更有可能对以信函形式通报结果的过程感到满意。提供书面信息，帮助参与者了解最不发达国家可能取得的成果及其意义，似乎是一种有用的资源，也是大规模最不发达国家方案成果通报书面方法的有益补充。
Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer can result in several potential outcomes of varying significance. Communication methods used in Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programmes must, therefore, ensure that participants are prepared for the range of possible results and follow-up. Here, we assess perceptions of a written preparatory information booklet provided to participants in a large LCS cohort designed to convey this information. All participants in the SUMMIT Study (NCT03934866) were provided with a results preparation information booklet, entitled ‘The SUMMIT Study: Next Steps’ at their baseline appointment which outlined potential results, their significance, and timelines for follow up. Results from the LDCT scan and Lung Health Check were subsequently sent by letter. Perceptions of this booklet were assessed among participants with indeterminate pulmonary findings when they attended a face-to-face appointment immediately before their three-month interval scan. Specifically, questions assessed the perceived usefulness of the booklet and the amount of information contained in it. 70.1% (n = 1,412/2,014) participants remembered receiving the booklet at their appointment. Of these participants, 72.0% (n = 1,017/1,412) found it quite or very useful and 68.0% (n = 960/1,412) reported that it contained the right amount of information. Older participants, those from the least deprived socioeconomic quintile and those of Black ethnicity were less likely to report finding the booklet either quite or very useful, or that it contained the right amount of information. Participants who remembered receiving the booklet were more likely to be satisfied with the process of results communication by letter. Providing written information that prepares participants for possible LDCT results and their significance appears to be a useful resource and a helpful adjunct to a written method of results communication for large scale LCS programmes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
--
作者：
Muller, Ingrid;Santer, Miriam;Yardley, Lucy
通讯作者：
Yardley, Lucy
DOI：
10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30124-9
发表时间：
1995-01-01
期刊：
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
影响因子：
--
作者：
SMITH, JA;SCAMMON, DL;BECK, SL
通讯作者：
BECK, SL
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Wilson, Elizabeth A. H.;Park, Denise C.;Wolf, Michael S.
通讯作者：
Wolf, Michael S.
影响因子：
10
作者：
Dickson JL;Hall H;Horst C;Tisi S;Verghese P;Mullin AM;Teague J;Farrelly L;Bowyer V;Gyertson K;Bojang F;Levermore C;Anastasiadis T;Sennett K;McCabe J;Devaraj A;Nair A;Navani N;Callister ME;Hackshaw A;SUMMIT Consortium;Quaife SL;Janes SM
通讯作者：
Janes SM
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Bartlett, Emily C.;Kemp, Samuel, V;Vaughan-Smith, Stephen
通讯作者：
Vaughan-Smith, Stephen