Effects of a Neuroscience-Based Mindfulness Meditation Program on Psychological Health: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Effects of a Neuroscience-Based Mindfulness Meditation Program on Psychological Health: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/40135
复制
发表时间：
2023-01-19
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Basso, Julia C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lynn, Sarah;Basso, Julia C.
关键词：
正念和冥想有着丰富的历史传统，越来越多的科学证据支持它们在为实践者创造积极的心理和神经可塑性变化方面的使用。尽管冥想可以通过各种方式传授，但科学界还没有系统地研究不同类型的冥想对神经心理学结果的影响，特别是当它与数字实施有关时。因此，正念的教学必须以证据为基础，因为冥想在科学和临床环境中都得到了应用。这项研究调查了教师暗示的使用和将神经科学教育整合到冥想计划中。同情暗示被选为实验操作的元素，因为佛教冥想的传统谱系教导对自己和他人的同情是冥想的主要结果之一。我们假设，与那些接受功能性线索的参与者相比，接受同情线索的参与者会改善神经心理结果，神经科学知识的获得将与积极的神经心理结果有关。受试者(n=)被随机分为两组，一组接受功能性暗示(对照组)，另一组接受同情暗示(实验组)，每周冥想5次，每次10分钟，持续4周。所有干预会议都通过数字演示进行管理。所有参与者都完成了日常干预前后的生态瞬时评估，以及干预前后的问卷调查。随着时间的推移，参与者表现出显著的益处，包括更多的正念和自我同情，减少抑郁，以及神经科学内容的增加(所有P<；.001)；然而，组间没有发现显著差异。每天的干预得分显示，从活跃到稳定，在统计学上有显著的变化。重要的是，正念的长期增长与同情心(r=0.326；P=.009)和自我同情心(r=0.424；P<；.001)的变化呈正相关，而与焦虑(r=-0.266；P=0.03)和抑郁(r=-0.271；P=0.03)的变化呈负相关。最后，冥想的急性效应与纵向结果显著相关(影响小到中等)，特别是与正念相关的结果。我们开发了一种新的基于神经科学的教育冥想计划，通过改善正念、自我同情和情绪状态来增强自我调节。我们的发现证明了参与正念冥想的行为重要性，并强化了冥想的好处与老师的暗示行为无关的观点。未来的研究将需要调查这些冥想诱导的结果背后的基于大脑的变化。
Mindfulness and meditation have a rich historical tradition, and a growing scientific base of evidence supports their use in creating positive psychological and neuroplastic changes for practitioners. Although meditation can be taught in various ways, the scientific community has yet to systematically study the impact of different types of meditation on neuropsychological outcomes, especially as it pertains to digital implementation. Therefore, it is critical that the instruction of mindfulness be evidence based because meditation is being used in both scientific and clinical settings. This study investigated the use of teacher cueing and the integration of neuroscience education into a meditation program. Compassion cueing was chosen as the element of experimental manipulation because traditional lineages of Buddhist meditation teach compassion for self and others as one of the primary outcomes of meditation. We hypothesized that participants receiving compassion cueing would have enhanced neuropsychological outcomes compared with those receiving functional cueing and that gains in neuroscience knowledge would relate to positive neuropsychological outcomes. Participants (n=89) were randomized to receive either functional cueing (control group) or compassion cueing (experimental group) and engaged with five 10-minute meditation sessions a week for 4 weeks. All intervention sessions were administered through digital presentation. All participants completed ecological momentary assessments before and after the daily intervention, as well as pre- and postintervention questionnaires. Participants demonstrated significant benefits over time, including increased mindfulness and self-compassion, decreased depression, and gains in neuroscience content (all P<.001); however, no significant between-group differences were found. Daily scores from each day of the intervention showed a statistically significant shift from active toward settled. Importantly, long-term increases in mindfulness were positively correlated to changes in compassion (r=0.326; P=.009) and self-compassion (r=0.424; P<.001) and negatively correlated to changes in anxiety (r=–0.266; P=.03) and depression (r=–0.271; P=.03). Finally, the acute effects of meditation were significantly correlated to the longitudinal outcomes (with a small-to-medium effect size), especially those relevant to mindfulness. We developed a novel neuroscience-based education–meditation program that enhanced self-regulation as evidenced by improved mindfulness, self-compassion, and mood state. Our findings demonstrate the behavioral importance of engaging with mindfulness meditation and reinforce the idea that the benefits of meditation are independent of teacher cueing behavior. Future studies will need to investigate the brain-based changes underlying these meditation-induced outcomes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Chen, Kevin W.;Berger, Christine C.;Manheimer, Eric;Forde, Darlene;Magidson, Jessica;Dachman, Laya;Lejuez, C. W.
通讯作者：
Lejuez, C. W.
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Condon, Paul;Desbordes, Gaelle;DeSteno, David
通讯作者：
DeSteno, David
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
BAER, DM;WOLF, MM;RISLEY, TR
通讯作者：
RISLEY, TR
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
BORDEN, JW;PETERSON, DR;JACKSON, EA
通讯作者：
JACKSON, EA
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Fox KC;Zakarauskas P;Dixon M;Ellamil M;Thompson E;Christoff K
通讯作者：
Christoff K