Role of Creativity in the Effectiveness of Cognitive Reappraisal.
Role of Creativity in the Effectiveness of Cognitive Reappraisal.
复制标题
创造力在认知重评有效性中的作用
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01598
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Luo J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wu X;Guo T;Tang T;Shi B;Luo J
认知重评作为一种被广泛认可和采用的情绪调节策略，已被普遍证明是有效的。然而，认知机制的监管效率，特别是创造力的作用，在认知重评不清楚。虽然先前的研究已经从生成的角度评估了创造力和重新评价之间的关系（即，产生认知重新评价和产生创造性想法涉及类似的认知神经网络）和个体差异（即，产生不同认知再评价的能力可以通过创造力相关测试的分数来预测），但认知再评价的效率如何与创造力相关仍然是未知的。本研究旨在探讨认知重评的创造性与其调节负性情绪的有效性之间的关系。在研究1中，参与者被要求对负面刺激进行重新评估，然后评估这些重新评估的创造性和调节有效性。结果表明，创造性评级和监管有效性之间的正相关，但我们发现，这是很难为参与者自己产生高度创造性的重新评价。因此，在研究2中，我们向参与者展示了精心准备的重新评估材料，这些材料在他们的创造力方面各不相同，并要求他们评估自己的监管有效性和创造力。结果表明，创造性和适当性是重评调节效应的显着预测，创造性是最占主导地位的预测。总之，两个实验都发现了再评价的创造性和有效性之间的正相关，从而暗示了创造性在再评价中起着重要的作用。
As a well-recognized and widely adopted emotional regulation strategy, cognitive reappraisal has generally been proven to be efficient. However, the cognitive mechanism underlying regulatory efficiency, particularly the role of creativity, in cognitive reappraisal is unclear. Although previous studies have evaluated the relationship between creativity and reappraisal from the perspectives of generation (i.e., generating cognitive reappraisals and generating creative ideas involve similar cognitive neural networks) and individual differences (i.e., the ability to generate different cognitive reappraisals can be predicted by scores on creativity-related tests), how cognitive reappraisal’s efficiency can be related to creativity is still unknown. In this research, we assessed the relationship between cognitive reappraisal’s creativity and its effectiveness in regulating negative emotion. In Study 1, participants were asked to generate reappraisals of negative stimuli and then evaluate the creativity and regulatory effectiveness of these reappraisals. The results indicated positive correlation between creativity rating and regulatory effectiveness, but we found that it was difficult for the participants to generate highly creative reappraisals on their own. Therefore, in Study 2, we showed participants well-prepared reappraisal materials that varied in their creativity and asked them to evaluate their regulatory effectiveness and creativity. The results suggested that creativity and appropriateness were significant predictors of the regulating effects of the reappraisal and that creativity was the most dominant predictor. In summary, both experiments found a positive correlation between reappraisal’s creativity and effectiveness, thus implying that creativity plays an important role in reappraisal.
登录
查看更多内容
福祉的创造性方式：在愤怒的情况下重新评估的创造力。
DOI：
10.3758/s13415-016-0465-9
发表时间：
2017-02
期刊：
Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fink A;Weiss EM;Schwarzl U;Weber H;de Assunção VL;Rominger C;Schulter G;Lackner HK;Papousek I
通讯作者：
Papousek I
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Jaarsveld S;Lachmann T
通讯作者：
Lachmann T
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Knoblich, G;Ohlsson, S;Raney, GE
通讯作者：
Raney, GE
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Buhle, Jason T.;Silvers, Jennifer A.;Ochsner, Kevin N.
通讯作者：
Ochsner, Kevin N.
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Kanske, Philipp;Kotz, Sonja A.
通讯作者：
Kotz, Sonja A.