Trends in research on the perioperative use of acupuncture in the last 20 years: A CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis and literature review
Trends in research on the perioperative use of acupuncture in the last 20 years: A CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis and literature review
复制标题
近20年围手术期针灸应用研究趋势:基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析与文献综述
DOI:
10.3389/fanes.2022.962280
复制
发表时间:
2022-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zhihong Lu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Minjuan Zhang;Zhuoma Cairen;Junbao Zhang;Yun Wang;Zhihong Lu
ObjectiveResearch on acupuncture-related techniques in the perioperative period has been increasing in the last 20 years. In this research, a bibliometric analysis was performed to review the application of acupuncture for perioperative medicine and to evaluate the trends in research on the perioperative use of acupuncture.MethodsCiteSpace was used to analyze published papers on the perioperative use of acupuncture in the Web of Science database from 2001 to 2021. The research trends were evaluated based on the number of publications, keywords, journals, countries, institutions, and authors. Moreover, collaborative networks and reference co-citation network maps were analyzed.ResultsA total of 719 related studies were included in the analyses. The number of annual publications has gradually been increasing. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine published the most (49 articles). Regarding the cited journals, Anesthesia Analgesia ranked first in terms of frequency (361), while Pain ranked first in terms of centrality (0.71). China (284) and the China Medical University (26) published the most. Wang Yu (21 articles) was the most active author, while Lee A (116) was the most co-cited author. The most co-cited reference was a meta-analysis of acupuncture for post-operative pain (212). The “post-operative cognitive dysfunction” cluster was new research directions that had recently emerged. Pain-related keywords had the highest frequency in keywords about indications.ConclusionResearch on perioperative acupuncture is a promising field, and more cooperation in global scientific research is needed. Our results may help researchers in identifying potential collaborators, research frontiers, and hot topics.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1002/14651858.cd003281.pub4
发表时间:
2015-11-02
期刊:
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
影响因子:
--
作者:
Lee A;Chan SK;Fan LT
通讯作者:
Fan LT
影响因子:
1
作者:
Alizadeh, Reza;Esmaeili, Sara;Shoar, Nasrin
通讯作者:
Shoar, Nasrin
影响因子:
--
作者:
Vickers, Andrew J.;Cronin, Angel M.;Maschino, Alexandra C.;Lewith, George;MacPherson, Hugh;Foster, Nadine E.;Sherman, Karen J.;Witt, Claudia M.;Linde, Klaus
通讯作者:
Linde, Klaus
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
El-Deeb, Alaa M.;Ahmady, Mona S.
通讯作者:
Ahmady, Mona S.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Ming Xu;Shou-jing Zhou;Cheng-chuan Jiang;Yi Wu;Weining Shi;Huahua Gu;Hua-Di Cai;Xiao-Qiang Wang
通讯作者:
Ming Xu;Shou-jing Zhou;Cheng-chuan Jiang;Yi Wu;Weining Shi;Huahua Gu;Hua-Di Cai;Xiao-Qiang Wang