Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.
Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.07.016
复制
发表时间:
2013-10-15
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Bikson, Marom
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guleyupoglu, Berkan;Schestatsky, Pedro;Edwards, Dylan;Fregni, Felipe;Bikson, Marom
关键词:
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) encompasses all methods of non-invasive current application to the brain used in research and clinical practice. We present the first comprehensive and technical review, explaining the evolution of tES in both terminology and dosage over the past 100 years of research to present day. Current transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation (tPCS) approaches such as Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) descended from Electrosleep (ES) through Cranial Electro-stimulation Therapy (CET), Transcerebral Electrotherapy (TCET), and NeuroElectric Therapy (NET) while others like Transcutaneous Cranial Electrical Stimulation (TCES) descended from Electroanesthesia (EA) through Limoge, and Interferential Stimulation. Prior to a contemporary resurgence in interest, variations of trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation were explored intermittently, including Polarizing current, Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS), and Transcranial Micropolarization. The development of these approaches alongside Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and pharmacological developments are considered. Both the roots and unique features of contemporary approaches such as transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) are discussed. Trends and incremental developments in electrode montage and waveform spanning decades are presented leading to the present day. Commercial devices, seminal conferences, and regulatory decisions are noted. We conclude with six rules on how increasing medical and technological sophistication may now be leveraged for broader success and adoption of tES.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
ARFAI, E;THEANO, G;ROBIN, AA
通讯作者:
ROBIN, AA
影响因子:
8.3
作者:
Baker JM;Rorden C;Fridriksson J
通讯作者:
Fridriksson J
DOI:
10.1109/embc.2012.6346036
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
影响因子:
--
作者:
Caparelli-Daquer EM;Zimmermann TJ;Mooshagian E;Parra LC;Rice JK;Datta A;Bikson M;Wassermann EM
通讯作者:
Wassermann EM
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
CHRISTENSEN, PA;ROTNE, M;HUSTED, C
通讯作者:
HUSTED, C
影响因子:
25.8
作者:
Brunoni, Andre R.;Valiengo, Leandro;Fregni, Felipe
通讯作者:
Fregni, Felipe