Keeping hope alive: Racial-ethnic disparities in distress tolerance are mitigated by religious/spiritual hope among Black Americans.
Keeping hope alive: Racial-ethnic disparities in distress tolerance are mitigated by religious/spiritual hope among Black Americans.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110403
复制
发表时间：
2021-05
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Krause N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McIntosh R;Ironson G;Krause N
种族和少数民族，包括黑人/非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人，表明较低的容忍心理困扰（DT）和世俗的希望，但支持更多的宗教和精神的希望比他们的非西班牙裔白色（NHW）同行。少数民族是否从非世俗的心理痛苦容忍希望中获得更大的利益仍然不清楚。自我报告的宗教/精神（R/S）的希望，世俗的希望，DT，和一些其他的社会心理，R/S和社会人口变量的认可进行了分析，从全国范围内的调查，年龄超过18岁的人（N = 2875）确定为黑人（14.2%），西班牙裔（15.4%），或NHW（67.3%）使用多元回归。总体而言，更高水平的R/S和长期的希望预测更大的DT。反过来，更大的DT与较低的身心痛苦相关。与NHW相比，少数民族群体报告的DT总体水平较低。种族-民族的相互作用进一步揭示，与不容忍痛苦的NHW相比，DT水平较低的黑人/非裔美国人报告了更高的R/S和世俗希望。西班牙裔/拉丁裔也更高的R/S和世俗的希望，但赞同较低的希望在较高水平的DT比参考组。虽然希望被认为是一种更被动的应对方式，但在边缘化的少数民族群体中，它更经常得到认可。然而，与NHW相比，与西班牙裔/拉丁裔相比，R/S希望减轻黑人/非洲裔美国人DT的程度确实存在差异。
Racial and ethnic minorities, including Blacks/African-Americans and Hispanics/Latinos, indicate lower tolerance to psychological distress (DT) and secular hope yet endorse more religious and spiritual hope than their non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. Whether racial-ethnic minorities derive greater benefit from nonsecular hope on the tolerance of psychological distress remains unclear. Self-reported endorsement of religious/spiritual (R/S) hope, secular hope, DT, and a number of other psychosocial, R/S and sociodemographic variables were analyzed from a nationwide survey of persons aged over 18 years (N = 2875) identifying as Black (14.2%), Hispanic (15.4%), or NHW (67.3%) using multiple regression. Overall, higher levels of both R/S and secular hope predicted greater DT. In turn, greater DT was associated with lower psychosomatic distress. Compared to NHW, the ethnic-minority groups reported lower overall levels of DT. An interaction for race-ethnicity further revealed that compared to distress intolerant NHW, Blacks/African-Americans at lower levels of DT report higher R/S and secular hope. Hispanics/Latinos were also higher on R/S and secular hope, but endorsed lower hope at higher levels of DT than the reference group. Although hope is considered a more passive form of coping, it is more frequently endorsed in marginalized ethnic-minority groups. However, compared to NHW, differences do exist in the extent to which R/S hope mitigates DT in Blacks/African-Americans compared to Hispanics/Latinos.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Gavin AR;Walton E;Chae DH;Alegria M;Jackson JS;Takeuchi D
通讯作者：
Takeuchi D
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Campbell, CM;Edward, RR;Fillingim, RB
通讯作者：
Fillingim, RB
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Daughters, Stacey B.;Reynolds, Elizabeth K.;Lejuez, C. W.
通讯作者：
Lejuez, C. W.
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Arredondo, EM;Elder, JP;Baquero, B
通讯作者：
Baquero, B
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Allan, Nicholas P.;Macatee, Richard J.;Schmidt, Norman B.
通讯作者：
Schmidt, Norman B.