Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT.

Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT.
复制标题

单排螺旋 CT 与多排探测器螺旋 CT 的阶梯伪影。

DOI:
10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jn13185
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
Radiology.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Napel,S
Napel,S
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fleischmann,D;Rubin,GD;Paik,DS;Yen,SY;Hilfiker,PR;Beaulieu,CF;Napel,S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的:比较单排和多排探测器螺旋CT(CT)采集参数对伪影大小和外观的影响。使用单排探测器在等中心和距离等中心100 mm处扫描相对于z轴倾斜45°的(12.7 × 305.0 mm)丙烯酸棒(单通道)螺旋CT(波束宽度,1-10 mm;间距,1.0、2.0或3.0)和多探测器行(四通道)螺旋CT(探测器宽度,1.25、2.5、3.75和5 mm;螺距,0.75或1.5)。沿棒沿着半径测量值的SD(SDr)用于量化所有72个数据集中的伪影并分析其频率模式。体积渲染图像的数据集进行了排名,由六个独立的和盲读者,结果与采集参数和SDrmeasurements.RESULTS:SDrwas小于在四个比单通道螺旋CT任何给定的表增量(TI)。在单通道螺旋CT中,SDr随束宽线性增加,随螺距几何增加。在四通道螺旋CT中,SDr测量值与TI成正比,与所使用的探测器宽度和螺距组合无关。偏离中心的目标位置平均增加SDr的一个因素的1.6倍的单通道螺旋CT和一个因素的2.0倍的四通道螺旋CT。图像质量的主观等级与SDr有很好的相关性(Spearmanr= 0.94,P <0.001)。结论:对于任何给定的TI,与单通道螺旋CT相比,四通道螺旋CT的伪影在数量上和主观上都更小。
PURPOSE:To compare the effects of acquisition parameters on the magnitude and appearance of artifacts between single and multiple detector-row helical computed tomography (CT).MATERIALS AND METHODS:A cylindric (12.7 × 305.0-mm) acrylic rod inclined 45° relative to the z axis was scanned at the isocenter and 100 mm from the isocenter with single detector-row (single-channel) helical CT (beam width, 1–10 mm; pitch, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0) and multiple detector-row (four-channel) helical CT (detector width, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, and 5 mm; pitch, 0.75 or 1.5). The SD of radius measurements along the rod (SDr) was used to quantify artifacts in all 72 data sets and to analyze their frequency patterns. Volume-rendered images of the data sets were ranked by six independent and blinded readers; findings were correlated with acquisition parameters and SDrmeasurements.RESULTS:SDrwas smaller in four- than in single-channel helical CT for any given table increment (TI). In single-channel helical CT, SDrincreased linearly with beam width and geometrically with pitch. In four-channel helical CT, SDrmeasurements were directly proportional to the TI, regardless of the detector width and pitch combination used. Off-center object position on average increased SDrby a factor of 1.6 for single-channel helical CT and by a factor of 2.0 for four-channel helical CT. Subjective rankings of image quality correlated excellently with SDr(Spearmanr= 0.94,P< .001).CONCLUSION:Artifacts are quantitatively and subjectively smaller with four- compared with single-channel helical CT for any given TI.
体积数据的体积分析:实现范式转变。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1996
期刊: Radiology
影响因子: 19.7
作者:
G. Rubin;S. Napel;A. Leung
通讯作者: A. Leung
DOI: 10.1118/1.598244
发表时间: 1998-05-01
期刊: MEDICAL PHYSICS
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Paik, DS;Beaulieu, CF;Napel, S
通讯作者: Napel, S
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn18670
发表时间: 2000-06-01
期刊: RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 19.7
作者:
Rubin, GD;Shiau, MC;Sofilos, MC
通讯作者: Sofilos, MC