Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment

Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment
复制标题

防止论文投标中审稿人分配被操纵的权衡

DOI:
10.48550/arxiv.2207.11315
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
ArXiv
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Vincent Conitzer
Vincent Conitzer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Steven Jecmen;Nihar B. Shah;Fei Fang;Vincent Conitzer

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

许多会议依靠论文招标作为他们的审稿人分配程序的关键组成部分。然后在分配审稿人时考虑这些投标,以帮助确保每个审稿人被分配到合适的论文。然而,尽管使用投标有好处,但依赖于论文投标可能会允许恶意审稿人出于不道德的目的操纵论文分配(例如,分配给朋友的论文)。已经提出并部署了几种不同的方法来防止这种操纵。在本文中,我们列举了处理出价操纵的算法应该满足的一些理想性质。然后,我们提供了各种方法的高级分析以及未来调查的方向。
Many conferences rely on paper bidding as a key component of their reviewer assignment procedure. These bids are then taken into account when assigning reviewers to help ensure that each reviewer is assigned to suitable papers. However, despite the benefits of using bids, reliance on paper bidding can allow malicious reviewers to manipulate the paper assignment for unethical purposes (e.g., getting assigned to a friend's paper). Several different approaches to preventing this manipulation have been proposed and deployed. In this paper, we enumerate certain desirable properties that algorithms for addressing bid manipulation should satisfy. We then offer a high-level analysis of various approaches along with directions for future investigation.
NIPS 2016审核流程的设计与分析
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 6
作者:
Shah, N. B.;Tabibian, B.;Muandet, K.;Guyon, I.;Von Luxburg, U.
通讯作者: Von Luxburg, U.
共谋团伙威胁计算机科学研究的完整性
DOI: 10.1145/3429776
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: 22.7
作者:
Littman, Michael L.
通讯作者: Littman, Michael L.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.197
发表时间: 2020-05-15
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Lei, Suzhen;Li, Xin;Zeng, Hongliang
通讯作者: Zeng, Hongliang