Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging--a phantom study.
Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging--a phantom study.
复制标题
双屏 CR 胸部成像中信噪比和对比度噪声比的区域改善——一项模型研究。
DOI:
10.1118/1.1376136
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Shaw,CC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu,X;Shaw,CC
The improvement of signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) in dual‐screen computed radiography (CR) has been investigated for various regions in images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom. With the dual‐screen CR technique, two image plates are placed in a cassette and exposed together during imaging. The exposed plates are separately scanned to form a front image and a back image, which are then registered and superimposed to form a composite image with improved SNRs and CNRs. The improvement can be optimized by applying specifically selected weighting factors during superimposition. In this study, dual‐screen CR images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom were acquired and formed with four different combinations of standard resolution (ST) and high‐resolution (HR) screens: ST–ST, ST–HR, HR–ST, and HR–HR. SNRs and their improvements were measured and compared over twelve representative regions‐of‐interest (ROIs) in these images. A 19.1%–45.7% increase of the SNR was observed, depending on the ROI and screen combination used. The optimal weighting factors were found to vary by only 4.5%–12.4%. Largest improvement was found in the lung field for all screen combinations. Improvement of CNRs was investigated over two ROIs in the lung field using the rib bones as the contrast objects and a 29.2%–43.9% improvement of the CNR was observed. Among the four screen combinations, ST–ST resulted in the most SNR and CNR improvement, followed in order by HR–ST, HR–HR, and ST–HR. The HR–ST combination yielded the lowest spatial variation of the optimal weighting factors with improved SNRs and CNRs close to those of the ST–ST combination.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
C. Shaw;D. S. Breitenstein
通讯作者:
D. S. Breitenstein
DOI:
10.1117/12.59393
发表时间:
1992
期刊:
The Journal of general and applied microbiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
C. Shaw;J. Herron;D. Gur
通讯作者:
D. Gur
DOI:
10.1117/12.154579
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
The Journal of general and applied microbiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Andrew D. A. Maidment;M. Yaffe;D. Plewes;G. Mawdsley;I. Soutar;B. Starkoski
通讯作者:
B. Starkoski
DOI:
10.1259/0007-1285-67-797-464
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
The British journal of radiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Brettle;S C Ward;G. Parkin;A. Cowen;H J Sumsion
通讯作者:
H J Sumsion
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Vedantham, S;Karellas, A;Hendrick, RE
通讯作者:
Hendrick, RE