Pathways to Livable Relocation Settlements Following Disaster
Pathways to Livable Relocation Settlements Following Disaster
复制标题
灾后搬迁宜居之路
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Amy Javernick‐Will
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shaye Palagi;Amy Javernick‐Will
大规模的重新安置，即把社区转移到新的住房开发区，通常是在灾害发生后实施的，尽管有人批评说，过去的项目没有为居民创造宜居的社区。宜居的搬迁社区是那些居民体验优质住房，公用事业，社会基础设施，睦邻友好，安全和持久感的社区。许多条件可以支持宜居性，例如场地位置，社区参与以及管理建设和受益人转移的过程。我们评估了菲律宾塔克洛班市的搬迁社区，应用定性比较分析来确定导致建筑和社会宜居性的途径或条件组合。我们发现，政府和非政府开发的网站之间的宜居途径通常不同，前者受益于较慢的速度和标准的许可程序，后者通过快速建设和使用规模以及需要促进改善服务。一个意想不到的组合出现了一条通往社会宜居的道路-偏远，由来自不同社区的家庭组成-揭示了搬迁中积极社会成果的新叙述。实现整体宜居性需要三个条件：快速建设、全面入住以及靠近经济和行政中心。这一分析展示了执行机构在寻求创建宜居搬迁社区时可以参考的必要条件和途径。
Mass relocation—the transfer of communities to new housing developments—is often implemented following disasters, despite criticism that past projects have not created livable communities for residents. Livable relocation communities are those where residents experience quality housing, utilities, social infrastructure, neighborliness, safety, and a sense of permanence. Numerous conditions may support livability, such as site location, community involvement, and processes of managing construction and beneficiary transfer. We evaluated relocation communities in Tacloban City, Philippines, applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify pathways, or combinations of conditions, that led to built and societal livability. We found pathways to livability generally differed between government and non-government developed sites, with the former benefiting from a slower pace and standard permitting procedures, and the latter by building fast and using scale and need to prompt improved services. An unexpected combination emerged as a pathway to societal livability—being remote and comprised of households originally from a mix of different communities—revealing a new narrative for positive social outcomes in relocation. Three conditions emerged as necessary for achieving overall livability: fast construction, full occupancy, and close proximity to an economic and administrative center. This analysis demonstrates necessary conditions and pathways that implementing agencies can reference in their quest to create livable relocation communities.
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Ruth, Matthias;Franklin, Rachel S.
通讯作者：
Franklin, Rachel S.