Islam, secularism and danger: a reconsideration of the link between religiosity, radicalism and rebellion in Central Asia
Islam, secularism and danger: a reconsideration of the link between religiosity, radicalism and rebellion in Central Asia
复制标题
伊斯兰教、世俗主义和危险：重新思考中亚宗教信仰、激进主义和叛乱之间的联系
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
John Heathershaw
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Montgomery;John Heathershaw
在将政治伊斯兰等同于激进主义和对国家的反叛时，安全分析人士对宗教、世俗和安全做出了许多假设。在中亚的背景下，宗教信仰与激进主义的话语融合产生了一个鬼怪，尽管各国政府和外国政府提供了截然不同的对策，但却发现了一个共同的敌人。伊斯兰教的这种证券化扭曲了我们对这些运动的理解，这些运动的方式在形式上很少是“激进的”。我们确定了关于该地区伊斯兰教的国际和国家世俗主义安全话语的六项不言自明的主张。然后，我们证明了流行的穆斯林话语和政治实践——在吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦的原始调查和民族志研究的结果中——提供了比精英话语更复杂的图景。虽然这六个命题可以在客观条件下被反驳，但它们仍然与问题如何在精英话语和实践中主观地产生和再现有关。作为一种特殊的世俗主义者对伊斯兰教的主张，它们为整个中亚的宗教自由和伊斯兰运动的国家和国际政策提供了信息。这些主题中的许多以较弱和模糊的形式出现在大众话语中，并继续限制穆斯林的政治参与。
ABSTRACT In equating political Islam with radicalism and rebellion against the state, security analysts make a number of assumptions about the religious, the secular and security. Within the Central Asian context, the discursive fusing of religiosity with radicalism produces a bogeyman in which national and foreign governments, although offering quite different countermeasures, have found a common enemy. This securitisation of Islam distorts our understanding of these movements whose approach is seldom ‘radical’ in form. We identify six claims which are axiomatic to both international and national secularist security discourses with respect to Islam in the region. We then demonstrate that popular Muslim discourse and political practice – in the findings of an original survey and ethnographic research in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan – provide a more complex picture than that found in elite discourses. While the six propositions can be refuted in objective terms, they remain relevant to how the problem is subjectively produced and reproduced in elite discourse and practice. As particular secularist claims about Islam, they inform national and international policies towards religious freedom and Islamic movements across Central Asia. Many of these themes appear in weaker and ambiguous forms in popular discourse and continue to limit Muslim political participation.
影响因子：
3
作者：
MAVELLI L
通讯作者：
MAVELLI L
误读伊拉克的伊斯兰教：世俗误解与英国外交政策
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Gutkowski S
通讯作者：
Gutkowski S