The people around you are inside your head: Social context shapes spontaneous thought.

The people around you are inside your head: Social context shapes spontaneous thought.
复制标题

你周围的人就在你的脑海里:社会环境塑造自发的想法。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Tamir
D. Tamir
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Judith N. Mildner;D. Tamir

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人类具有高度的社会性。我们花了大部分时间与社交世界互动,我们花了大部分时间思考社交世界。我们是天生的社会性生物,还是我们的社会性是对社会世界的回应?一方面,基本的社会需求可能会驱动社会行为。根据这一说法,当环境不够社会化时,社会思想就会满足社会需求。另一方面,自发的想法可能会处理传入的信息。根据这种说法,社会思想反映了环境中的社会信息。为了在这些可能性之间进行仲裁,我们评估了在三种社会背景下走神时自发思维的内容:独处(研究1)、社会存在(研究2)和社会互动(研究3)。此外,在研究1中,我们使用功能神经成像来测量参与者在考虑社会性和非社会性目标时的神经活动。结果一致地表明,自发思维反映了我们周围世界的社会性:当想到亲密的朋友时,独处减少了自发的社交思维,并减少了心智网络中的神经活动。社会存在并没有改变自发的社会思想。社会互动增加了自发的社会思维。最后,个体差异分析(研究4)表明,处于更多社会环境中的人具有更多的社会思维。综上所述,这些结果显示了在日益社会化的环境中,社会思潮不断增加的模式。因此,社会内容在自发思维中的优势可以用我们周围世界的社会内容优势来解释,而不是我们与生俱来的基本社会需求。(JuncINFO数据库记录(C)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
Humans are highly social. We spend most of our time interacting with the social world, and we spend most of our thoughts thinking about the social world. Are we social beings by default, or is our sociality a response to the social world? On the one hand, fundamental social needs may drive social behavior. According to this account, social thoughts fulfill social needs when the environment is insufficiently social. On the other hand, spontaneous thoughts may process incoming information. According to this account, social thoughts reflect the social information in the environment. To arbitrate between these possibilities, we assessed the content of spontaneous thought during mind wandering in three social contexts: solitude (Study 1), social presence (Study 2), and social interaction (Study 3). Additionally, in Study 1, we used functional neuroimaging to measure neural activity while participants considered social and nonsocial targets. Results consistently showed that spontaneous thought reflects the sociality of the world around us: Solitude decreased spontaneous social thought and decreased neural activity in the mentalizing network when thinking about a close friend. Social presence did not change spontaneous social thought. Social interaction increased spontaneous social thought. Finally, individual differences analyses (Study 4) showed that people in more social environments have more social thoughts. Together, the results show a pattern of increasing social thought in increasingly social environments. The predominance of social content in spontaneous thought can thus be explained by the predominance of social content in the world around us, rather than our innate, fundamental social needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030920
发表时间: 2012
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Schilbach L;Bzdok D;Timmermans B;Fox PT;Laird AR;Vogeley K;Eickhoff SB
通讯作者: Eickhoff SB
DOI: 10.1037/a0025250
发表时间: 2012-05
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子: --
作者:
McVay JC;Kane MJ
通讯作者: Kane MJ
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
发表时间: 1996-02-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Russell, DW
通讯作者: Russell, DW