Real-world clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in suspected COVID-19: A systematic meta-analysis of available data as of November 20, 2020.
Real-world clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in suspected COVID-19: A systematic meta-analysis of available data as of November 20, 2020.
复制标题
现实世界中的现实SARS-COV-2快速抗原测试在可疑的Covid-19:截至2020年11月20日,可用数据的系统荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.029
复制
发表时间:
2021-07
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zemmrich C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hayer J;Kasapic D;Zemmrich C
Rapid antigen tests, or RATs, are a type of lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay utilized to aid the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to compare the real-world performance of commercially available RATs. We searched several databases and websites for manufacturer-independent prospective clinical performance studies comparing SARS-CoV-2 RATs and RT-PCR. Only studies on RATs that did not need a separate reader for result retrieval and that reported data on viral load, patients’ symptom status, sample type, and PCR assay used were included. 19 studies utilizing 11,109 samples with 2,509 RT-PCR-positives were included. RAT sensitivity varied between 28.9% (95% CI 16.4–44.3) and 98.3% (95% CI 91.1–99.7), likely dependent upon population characteristics, viral load, and symptom status. RAT specificity varied between 92.4% (95% CI 87.4–95.9) and 100% (95% CI 99.7–100) with one outlier. The RATs by Roche Diagnostics/SD Biosensor and Abbott had the highest pooled sensitivity (82.4% [95% CI 74.2–88.4] and 76.9% [95% CI 72.1–81.2], respectively). Sensitivity in high-viral-load samples (cycle threshold ≤25) showed heterogeneity among the different RATs. The RATs offered by Roche Diagnostics/SD Biosensor and Abbott provide sufficient manufacturer-independent, real-world performance data to support their use to detect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in high-viral-load populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Chaimayo C;Kaewnaphan B;Tanlieng N;Athipanyasilp N;Sirijatuphat R;Chayakulkeeree M;Angkasekwinai N;Sutthent R;Puangpunngam N;Tharmviboonsri T;Pongraweewan O;Chuthapisith S;Sirivatanauksorn Y;Kantakamalakul W;Horthongkham N
通讯作者:
Horthongkham N
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Bullard, Jared;Dust, Kerry;Poliquin, Guillaume
通讯作者:
Poliquin, Guillaume
影响因子:
2
作者:
Rutter, CM;Gatsonis, CA
通讯作者:
Gatsonis, CA
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Krüttgen A;Cornelissen CG;Dreher M;Hornef MW;Imöhl M;Kleines M
通讯作者:
Kleines M
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Reitsma, JB;Glas, AS;Zwinderman, AH
通讯作者:
Zwinderman, AH