Prospective Validation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of a New Point Shear Wave Elastographic Technique for Assessing Liver Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Prospective Validation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of a New Point Shear Wave Elastographic Technique for Assessing Liver Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.926
复制
发表时间:
2017-11
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Han JK
Han JK
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ahn SJ;Lee JM;Chang W;Lee SM;Kang HJ;Yang H;Yoon JH;Park SJ;Han JK

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

评价一种新的点剪切波弹性成像技术(PSWE、S-Searwave、Samsung Medison)在观察者内和观察者间的重复性,并比较其与已建立的PSWE技术(虚拟触摸量化,VTQ)在评估肝脏僵硬(LS)方面的准确性。33名患者参加了这项机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究。在同一会议期间,分别在Acuson S2000系统(西门子Healthineer)和S-ShearWave系统(三星Medison)上用VTQ测量LS值,然后再进行两次S-Searwave会话,以8小时为间隔进行观察者间和观察者内变化。比较两种pSWE技术测量的技术成功率和可靠性。组内相关系数(ICCs)决定了S剪切波在观察者内和观察者间的重复性。用两种方法测量LS值。以瞬时弹性成像的LS值为参考标准,采用受试者工作特征曲线分析和Obuchowski测量,评价其对重度纤维化(F≥3)和肝硬变(F=4)的诊断性能。VTQ(100%,33/33)和S-剪波(96.9%,32/33)技术在技术SR(p=0.63)和LS测量的可靠性(93.9%,30/32)方面无显著差异(p=0.61)。使用S-剪切波技术测量LS的观察者间和观察者内的一致性很好(ICC分别为0.98和0.99)。两种pSWE技术的LS值差异无统计学意义,具有良好的相关性(r=0.78)。对于F-≥3和F=4,室性心动过速与S-剪波的诊断准确率相当,受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.87(95%可信区间0.70~0.96)、0.89(95%可信区间0.74~0.97),S-剪波分别为0.84(95%可信区间0.67~0.94)、0.94(95%可信区间0.80~0.99)。奥布霍夫斯基指标对于S-剪波和VTQ也是同样高的(0.94vs.0.95)。S-剪切波在检测LS方面表现出与VTQ相当的良好的观察者间和观察者内的一致性和诊断效果。
To assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear wave elastography technique (pSWE, S-Shearwave, Samsung Medison) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with an established pSWE technique (Virtual Touch Quantification, VTQ). Thirty-three patients were enrolled in this Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study. LS values were measured by VTQ on an Acuson S2000 system (Siemens Healthineer) and S-Shearwave on an RS-80A (Samsung Medison) in the same session, followed by two further S-Shearwave sessions for inter- and intra-observer variation at 8-hour intervals. The technical success rate (SR) and reliability of the measurements of both pSWE techniques were compared. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of S-Shearwave was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). LS values were measured by both methods of pSWE. The diagnostic performance in severe fibrosis (F ≥ 3) and cirrhosis (F = 4) was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and the Obuchowski measure with the LS values of transient elastography as the referenced standard. The VTQ (100%, 33/33) and S-Shearwave (96.9%, 32/33) techniques did not display a significant difference in technical SR (p = 0.63) or reliability of LS measurements (96.9%, 32/33; 93.9%, 30/32, respectively, p = 0.61). The inter- and intra-observer agreement for LS measurements using the S-Shearwave technique was excellent (ICC = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively). The mean LS values of both pSWE techniques were not significantly different and exhibited a good correlation (r = 0.78). To detect F ≥ 3 and F = 4, VTQ and S-Shearwave showed comparable diagnostic accuracy as indicated by the following outcomes: areas under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) = 0.87 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.70–0.96), 0.89 for VTQ (95% CI 0.74–0.97), respectively; and AUROC = 0.84 (95% CI 0.67–0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.80–0.99) for S-Shearwave (p > 0.48), respectively. The Obuchowski measures were similarly high for S-Shearwave and VTQ (0.94 vs. 0.95). S-Shearwave shows excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement and diagnostic effectiveness comparable to VTQ in detecting LS.
DOI: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.arfi
发表时间: 2015-06-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Bota, Simona;Sporea, Ioan;Gradinaru-Tascau, Oana
通讯作者: Gradinaru-Tascau, Oana
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.2.197
发表时间: 2014-02-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Ferraioli, Giovanna;Parekh, Parth;Filice, Carlo
通讯作者: Filice, Carlo
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.007
发表时间: 2015-05-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Ferraioli, Giovanna;Filice, Carlo;Kudo, Masatoshi
通讯作者: Kudo, Masatoshi
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708
发表时间: 1983-01-01
期刊: RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 19.7
作者:
HANLEY, JA;MCNEIL, BJ
通讯作者: MCNEIL, BJ
DOI: 10.14366/usg.16024
发表时间: 2016-10-01
期刊: ULTRASONOGRAPHY
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Hollerieth, Katharina;Gassmann, Bernhard;Stock, Konrad Friedrich
通讯作者: Stock, Konrad Friedrich