What drives the vaccination intention against COVID-19? Application of EPPM, TAM, and theories of risk assessment.
What drives the vaccination intention against COVID-19? Application of EPPM, TAM, and theories of risk assessment.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/21645515.2023.2180969
复制
发表时间：
2023-12-31
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
疫苗被广泛用于对抗 COVID-19。然而，由于一些人对 COVID-19 疫苗感到担忧，因此出现了对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。本研究利用扩展并行过程模型（EPPM）、技术接受模型（TAM）和风险信息评估理论调查了中国针对 COVID-19 的疫苗接种意愿。结果表明，疫苗接种意愿的形成机制可以被视为一个心理过程，因为主观知识是影响受访者对疫苗接种潜在积极（有用）和消极影响（威胁）权重的主要影响因素。这种不平等的考虑导致了受试者之间不同程度的恐惧唤起。在有用性/威胁感知和恐惧的驱动下，人们采取不同的决策策略，即所谓的分析评估和经验评估来做出疫苗接种决定。除了经验评估对疫苗接种意愿的直接影响外，两种决策策略和恐惧唤醒也通过疫苗接种态度的中介作用影响人们的疫苗接种意愿。对于政策制定者和利益相关者来说，这项研究提供了建立信心的知识库，以及有关 COVID-19 疫苗接种的情感指导。
Vaccines are widely used to fight against COVID-19. However, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy appears as some individuals are concerned with COVID-19 vaccines. This study investigates the vaccination intention against COVID-19 in China with the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and theories of risk information assessment. Results showed that the formation mechanism of vaccination intention could be considered a psychological process, as subjective knowledge was a primary influence on correspondents’ weighting of both the potentially positive (usefulness) and negative effects (threat) of vaccination. This unequal consideration then resulted in different levels of fear arousal between subjects. Driven by usefulness/threat perception and fear, people conducted different decision strategies, so-called analytical assessment, and experiential assessment to make vaccination decision. In addition to the direct effects of experiential assessment on vaccination intention, two decision strategies and fear arousal also affected people’s vaccination intention through the mediation role of vaccination attitude. For policymakers and stakeholders, this study provides a knowledge base for confidence-building, and emotional guidance concerning against COVID-19 vaccination.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Barnett DJ;Balicer RD;Thompson CB;Storey JD;Omer SB;Semon NL;Bayer S;Cheek LV;Gateley KW;Lanza KM;Norbin JA;Slemp CC;Links JM
通讯作者：
Links JM
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Freeman, Daniel;Waite, Felicity;Lambe, Sinead
通讯作者：
Lambe, Sinead
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Abu Farha, Rana K.;Alzoubi, Karem H.;Alfaqih, Mahmoud A.
通讯作者：
Alfaqih, Mahmoud A.
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
FISHBEIN, M
通讯作者：
FISHBEIN, M
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Al-Metwali, Basma Zuheir;Al-Jumaili, Ali Azeez;Sorofman, Bernard
通讯作者：
Sorofman, Bernard