Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting
Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting
复制标题
在保护优先事项设定中平衡多种生态系统服务
DOI：
10.1007/s10980-014-0106-z
复制
发表时间：
2015-03
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Zeng Yuan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zhang Liwei;Fu Bojie;Lu Yihe;Zeng Yuan
保护优先级的设定是分配有限资源用于自然保护和维护生物多样性和生态系统服务（ESs）的可持续性的关键过程。然而，要同时保护生物多样性和生态系统是很困难的，这不仅是因为生物多样性和生态系统之间存在着潜在的权衡，而且也是因为多个生态系统之间的权衡。迄今为止，研究主要集中在由土地利用变化引起的空间竞争或多个生态系统之间生物物理相互作用的破坏引起的生态系统之间的权衡。然而，注意到了在决策过程中引起的权衡取舍。因此，在决策过程中衡量多个环境要素之间的权衡取舍的方法将证明是非常有用的。在本文中，我们绘制了2010年中国江西省的水供应，土壤保持和净初级生产力作为ESs，并使用风险，权衡和空间效率指数来衡量两个保护水平（保护江西省10%或20%的面积上的最高ESs）下的7个有序加权平均（OWA）情景的保护效率。主要结果如下：（1）保留一个ES可能导致其他ES的低效保护;（2）保留多个ES和使用基于GIS的OWA方法可以平衡多个ES之间的冲突，并可以显着提高所确定的优先区域的空间效率。决策者可以结合联合收割机的空间效率，风险和权衡水平的每一个OWA方案与其他具体的保护需求，他们自己的特定情况下，以实现最佳的识别优先领域，同时保护多个ES。
Conservation priority setting is the critical process of allocating the limited resources available for nature conservation and; safeguarding the sustainability of biodiversity and ecosystem services (ESs). It is difficult, however, to achieve the goal of simultaneously conserving both biodiversity and ESs, not only because of the potential trade-offs between biodiversity and ESs, but also because of the trade-offs between multiple ESs. Thus far, research has focused on the trade-offs between ESs caused by spatial competition resulting from land use change or by the destruction of biophysical interaction between multiple ESs. Few studies, however, have paid attention to the trade-offs induced during the decision-making process. Approaches for measuring the trade-offs between multiple ESs in decision-making processes would thus prove to be extremely helpful. In this paper, we map the water supply, soil conservation, and net primary production as ESs in the Jiangxi province of China in the year 2010, and use risk, tradeoff, and spatial efficiency indices to measure the conservation efficiency of seven established ordered weighted averaging (OWA) scenarios under two conservation levels (conserving the top ESs at 10 or 20 % of the area of the Jiangxi province). The main results are as follows: (1) conserving one ES may result in inefficient conservation of other ESs; and (2) conserving multiple ESs and the use of GIS-based OWA methods can balance conflicts among multiple ESs and can significantly enhance the spatial efficiency of the identified priority areas. Decision-makers may combine the spatial efficiency, risk and tradeoff levels of each OWA scenario with other specific conservation demands of their own specific cases in order to achieve the optimal identification of priority areas for the simultaneous conservation of multiple ESs.
登录
查看更多内容
使用基于 GIS 的多标准评估确定生态系统服务保护的优先领域
影响因子：
0.5
作者：
Yang, Xiaoying;Wang, Yongxiao;Wang, Xiangrong;Cai, Yuanbin
通讯作者：
Cai, Yuanbin
影响因子：
56.9
作者：
PIMM, SL;RUSSELL, GJ;BROOKS, TM
通讯作者：
BROOKS, TM
DOI：
10.1641/b571009
发表时间：
2007-11
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
W. Turner;K. Brandon;T. Brooks;R. Costanza;G. A. D. da Fonseca;R. Portela
通讯作者：
W. Turner;K. Brandon;T. Brooks;R. Costanza;G. A. D. da Fonseca;R. Portela
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1978
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
W. H. Wischmeier;D. Smith
通讯作者：
W. H. Wischmeier;D. Smith
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Sharpley;John R. Williams
通讯作者：
A. Sharpley;John R. Williams