Anti-austerity between militant materialism and real democracy: exploring pragmatic prefigurativism
Anti-austerity between militant materialism and real democracy: exploring pragmatic prefigurativism
复制标题
激进的唯物主义与真正的民主之间的反紧缩：探索实用的比喻主义
DOI：
10.1080/14747731.2020.1722493
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
David Bailey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Olatz Ribera;Nikolai Huke;Monica Clua;David Bailey
2008年全球经济危机和2010年欧元区危机之后出现的反紧缩运动是危机之后“紧缩时代”的一部分，其基础是一套我们在这里称之为“实用主义预设”的思想和实践。虽然反紧缩运动通常拒绝马克思主义和无政府主义等正式的意识形态，但实用主义的预喻主义可以被理解为某种“左翼趋同”。本文通过对英国和西班牙的反紧缩运动的比较，探讨了这种语用预设主义的特点。特别是，我们注意到反应迟钝的民主机构在推动走向实用主义prefigurativism，采用直接民主和直接行动的技术作为表达声音和拒绝紧缩的手段，以及随后（重新）转向政治机构的实用性方面的作用。
ABSTRACT The anti-austerity movement that emerged in the wake of the 2008 global economic crisis and 2010 Eurozone crisis, and which forms part of the ‘age of austerity’ that came after those crises, was underpinned by a set of ideas and practices that we refer to here as ‘pragmatic prefigurativism’. Whilst the anti-austerity movements typically rejected formal ideologies such as Marxism and anarchism, nevertheless pragmatic prefigurativism can be understood as a ‘left convergence’ of sorts. The paper explores the features of this pragmatic prefigurativism, comparing the anti-austerity movements in the UK and Spain. In particular, we note the role of unresponsive institutions of democracy in prompting the move towards pragmatic prefigurativism, the adoption of techniques of direct democracy and direct action as the means through which to express a voice and to refuse austerity, and the pragmatic nature of the subsequent (re)turn to political institutions when this became a possibility.
扰乱欧洲危机：竞争、颠覆和逃避的批判政治经济学
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Huke N
通讯作者：
Huke N
挑战紧缩时代：全球经济危机后的颠覆性机构
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Bailey D
通讯作者：
Bailey D